Department of Psychology, 1 LMU Drive, Suite 4700, Los Angeles, CA 90045, USA.
Addict Behav. 2010 Dec;35(12):1094-101. doi: 10.1016/j.addbeh.2010.08.003. Epub 2010 Aug 10.
The current quasi-experimental design evaluated whether a brief, live, interactive, normative group (BLING) intervention produced immediate reductions in group-specific normative perceptions and whether the magnitude of these misperceptions differed among three at risk undergraduate populations: first-year students (N=767), Greek-affiliated students (N=555), and student-athletes (N=524). In a live group setting, participants used wireless keypads to enter in normative perceptions of their group's drinking levels, followed by their own actual drinking behaviors. Feedback data illustrating the discrepancies between perceived and actual norms were then presented graphically on a large screen. Across all groups at pre-intervention, respondents reported significantly higher perceived group-specific norms than actual alcohol use, with magnitude of initial misperceptions varying by group. The BLING intervention was equally effective in immediately correcting normative misperceptions among all three groups regardless of gender or the magnitude of initial misperception. These data further validate the ability of live normative group-specific data-collection and feedback to overcome saliency and credibility issues exhibited by many existing social norms interventions.
当前的准实验设计评估了简短、现场、互动、规范组(BLING)干预是否会立即减少特定群体的规范感知,以及这些误解的程度是否因三个处于风险中的本科生群体而有所不同:一年级学生(N=767)、希腊联谊会学生(N=555)和运动员学生(N=524)。在现场小组环境中,参与者使用无线键盘输入他们所在群体的饮酒水平的规范感知,然后输入他们自己的实际饮酒行为。然后,通过图形在大屏幕上显示反馈数据,说明感知规范与实际规范之间的差异。在干预前的所有群体中,受访者报告的群体特定规范感知明显高于实际饮酒量,初始误解的程度因群体而异。BLING 干预在立即纠正所有三个群体的规范误解方面同样有效,无论性别或初始误解的程度如何。这些数据进一步验证了现场规范特定群体数据收集和反馈的能力,可以克服许多现有社会规范干预措施所表现出的突出性和可信度问题。