Xu Qian, Zhu Shu-Chai, Liu Zhi-Kun, Cao Yan-Kun, Song Chang-Liang, Li You-Mei, Wang Shi-Jie
Department of CT, The Fourth Hospital of Hebei Medical University, Shijiazhuang 050011, China.
Zhonghua Zhong Liu Za Zhi. 2010 Jun;32(6):432-5.
Using the volume calculating function of treatment planning system of 3DCRT to work out the value of GTV standard classifications and to provide the reference for clinical staging of esophageal carcinoma.
Six hundred and seven patients underwent radical resection of thoracic esophageal carcinoma in our hospital, and their pre-operative CT images were transmitted in digital format to the three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy planning system by the network. Esophageal lesion GTV targets were outlined, and their volumes were automatically computed by the planning system. Compared the differences of the GTV volumes in different pathological T stages, and analyzed the relationship between GTV volumes and pathological T stages. According to the median volume of GTV at different pathological T stages, divided the values of GTV volume corresponding to different T stages and selected the suitable classification standard of GTV volume.
The esophageal carcinoma GTV length, maximum diameter and volume were related to pathological T staging and with a positive correlation (all P < 0.001). The Spearman correlation coefficient (r) was 0.376, 0.466 and 0.464, respectively, P < 0.001. Except that the length, maximum diameter and volume of GTV in pathological T3 and T4 had no significant difference, other indicators of the pathological T stages showed significant differences between the groups (P < 0.001). According to the median volume of GTV at different pathological T stages, the GTV volumes were divided into three grades: <or= 5.0 cm(3), 5.1 - 13.0 cm(3), and > 13.0 cm(3). When compared them with pathological T1, T2, and T3-T4 stages, the coincidence rate was 73.8%. The consistency was good between the GTV volume grades and pathological T stages (Kappa = 0.40, P < 0.001). The overall 5-year survival rates of GTV grades 1, 2, 3 were 78.1%, 31.5% and 33.5%, respectively (P < 0.0001). If the GTVs were divided into four grades: <or= 5.0 cm(3), 5.1 - 13.0 cm(3), 13.1 - 39.0 cm(3), and > 39.0 cm(3), the coincidence rate of GTV volume grades and pathology T staging was only 54.7%, and the consistency was poor, Kappa = 0.24, P < 0.001. The overall 5-year survival rate of GTV 1, 2, 3, 4 were 78.1%, 31.5%, 36.2% and 27.5%, respectively (P < 0.0001).
The length, maximum diameter and volume of esophageal carcinoma GTV are related to pathological T staging with a positive correlation. The classification that esophageal carcinoma GTVs divided into three grades has a good coincidence with the pathological T staging.
利用三维适形放疗(3DCRT)治疗计划系统的体积计算功能,得出食管癌大体肿瘤体积(GTV)的标准分级值,为食管癌临床分期提供参考。
收集我院607例行胸段食管癌根治术患者的术前CT图像,以数字形式通过网络传输至三维适形放疗计划系统。勾画出食管病变的GTV靶区,由计划系统自动计算其体积。比较不同病理T分期GTV体积的差异,分析GTV体积与病理T分期的关系。根据不同病理T分期GTV体积的中位数,划分不同T分期对应的GTV体积值,选取合适的GTV体积分级标准。
食管癌GTV长度、最大径及体积与病理T分期相关,呈正相关(均P<0.001)。Spearman相关系数(r)分别为0.376、0.466及0.464,P<0.001。除病理T3与T4期GTV的长度、最大径及体积差异无统计学意义外,其余各病理T分期组间各指标差异均有统计学意义(P<0.001)。根据不同病理T分期GTV体积的中位数,将GTV体积分为三级:≤5.0 cm³、5.1 - 13.0 cm³、>13.0 cm³。与病理T1、T2、T3 - T4期比较,符合率为73.8%。GTV体积分级与病理T分期一致性良好(Kappa=0.40,P<0.001)。GTV 1、2、3级患者的总体5年生存率分别为78.1%、31.5%和33.5%(P<0.0001)。若将GTV分为四级:≤5.0 cm³、5.1 - 13.0 cm³、13.1 - 39.0 cm³、>39.0 cm³,则GTV体积分级与病理T分期的符合率仅为54.7%,一致性差,Kappa=0.24,P<0.001。GTV 1、2、3、4级患者的总体5年生存率分别为78.1%、31.5%、36.2%和27.5%(P<0.0001)。
食管癌GTV的长度、最大径及体积与病理T分期相关,呈正相关。食管癌GTV分为三级的分级与病理T分期符合良好。