• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

你是否跟我想的一样?青少年敌对归因倾向的同伴群体相似性。

Are you thinking what I'm thinking? Peer group similarities in adolescent hostile attribution tendencies.

机构信息

School of Psychology and Clinical Language Sciences, University of Reading, 3 Earley Gate, Whiteknights, Reading RG6 6AL, United Kingdom.

出版信息

Dev Psychol. 2010 Sep;46(5):1385-8. doi: 10.1037/a0020383.

DOI:10.1037/a0020383
PMID:20822248
Abstract

A bias toward attributing hostile intent to others has been linked to aggression. In an adolescent sample, the question of whether peer group homophily exists in the tendency toward attributing hostile intent was investigated. Hostile attribution tendencies and self-reported aggressive behaviors were assessed in a normative sample of 910 adolescents and average peer group scores were computed on the basis of nominated friend scores. Results indicated that adolescents showed significant correlations between their own level of hostile attributions and that of their peer group. Further analyses indicated that this effect occurred specifically in reciprocal friendships and was retained even when own and peer group levels of aggression were controlled.

摘要

将敌意归因于他人的偏见与攻击性有关。在青少年样本中,研究了在归因于敌意的倾向中是否存在同伴群体同质性的问题。在一个由 910 名青少年组成的规范样本中,评估了敌意归因倾向和自我报告的攻击行为,并且根据提名的朋友分数计算了平均同伴群体分数。结果表明,青少年在自己的敌意归因水平和同伴群体的敌意归因水平之间表现出显著的相关性。进一步的分析表明,这种效应仅在互惠友谊中发生,即使在控制了自己和同伴群体的攻击性水平后,这种效应仍然存在。

相似文献

1
Are you thinking what I'm thinking? Peer group similarities in adolescent hostile attribution tendencies.你是否跟我想的一样?青少年敌对归因倾向的同伴群体相似性。
Dev Psychol. 2010 Sep;46(5):1385-8. doi: 10.1037/a0020383.
2
An experimental investigation of peer influences on adolescent hostile attributions.同伴影响对青少年敌对归因的实验研究。
J Clin Child Adolesc Psychol. 2011;40(6):897-903. doi: 10.1080/15374416.2011.614582.
3
Explaining the paradoxical rejection-aggression link: the mediating effects of hostile intent attributions, anger, and decreases in state self-esteem on peer rejection-induced aggression in youth.解释矛盾的拒绝-攻击关系:敌意归因、愤怒和状态自尊下降在同伴拒绝引起的青少年攻击中的中介作用。
Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2011 Jul;37(7):955-63. doi: 10.1177/0146167211410247.
4
Peer and cyber aggression in secondary school students: the role of moral disengagement, hostile attribution bias, and outcome expectancies.中学生同伴和网络欺凌:道德脱离、敌意归因偏差和结果预期的作用。
Aggress Behav. 2010 Mar-Apr;36(2):81-94. doi: 10.1002/ab.20336.
5
Real-time hostile attribution measurement and aggression in children.儿童实时敌意归因测量与攻击行为
Aggress Behav. 2014 Sep-Oct;40(5):409-20. doi: 10.1002/ab.21532. Epub 2014 Feb 20.
6
Social cognitive biases and deficits in aggressive boys.攻击性男孩的社会认知偏差与缺陷
Child Dev. 1982 Jun;53(3):620-35.
7
Negative feelings exacerbate hostile attributions of intent in highly aggressive boys.消极情绪会加剧高度攻击性男孩对意图的敌意归因。
J Clin Child Adolesc Psychol. 2003 Mar;32(1):56-65. doi: 10.1207/S15374424JCCP3201_06.
8
Relationship specificity of aggressogenic thought-behavior processes.攻击性行为思想-行为过程的关系特异性。
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2011 Aug;101(2):386-400. doi: 10.1037/a0023662.
9
Frequent aggression and attribution of hostile intent in people with mild to moderate intellectual disabilities: an empirical investigation.轻度至中度智力残疾者的频繁攻击行为及敌意意图归因:一项实证研究。
Am J Ment Retard. 2006 Mar;111(2):90-9. doi: 10.1352/0895-8017(2006)111[90:FAAAOH]2.0.CO;2.
10
Implicit theories of personality and attributions of hostile intent: a meta-analysis, an experiment, and a longitudinal intervention.人格内隐理论与敌意归因偏向:一项元分析、一项实验和一项纵向干预研究
Child Dev. 2013 Sep-Oct;84(5):1651-67. doi: 10.1111/cdev.12062. Epub 2013 Feb 12.

引用本文的文献

1
Hostile Intent Attribution and Aggressive Behavior in Children Revisited: A Meta-Analysis.重新审视儿童敌意归因和攻击行为:一项元分析。
Child Dev. 2019 Sep;90(5):e525-e547. doi: 10.1111/cdev.13255. Epub 2019 Jun 5.