Department of Psychology, College of the Holy Cross, Worcester, MA 01610, USA.
Psychol Assess. 2010 Sep;22(3):675-87. doi: 10.1037/a0019914.
The Texas Revised Inventory of Grief-Present scale (TRIG-Present) is one of the most widely used grief measures; however, researchers have only empirically examined the validity and underlying factor structure of TRIG-Present scores in a few studies. Hence, in the present investigation, we sought to examine the factorial validity of the TRIG-Present (those scores that index current grief) among 2 samples of bereaved older adults--a community-dwelling sample of 162 individuals who experienced a diverse set of losses in terms of relationship to the deceased and time since loss, and a recently widowed sample of 212 individuals who were assessed at 2-months and 12-months postloss. Across both samples, we found support for a 3-factor model, composed of clusters of items representing Emotional Response, Thoughts, and Nonacceptance regarding a loss. Additionally, this 3-factor model exhibited significant invariance from 2-months to 12-months postloss in the recently widowed sample. Analyses examining the convergent validity of these 3 factors also suggest that this conceptualization of the TRIG-Present could have practical advantages and potentially influence the way in which clinicians and/or researchers assess grief and evaluate bereavement interventions.
德克萨斯修订悲痛量表-当前分量表(TRIG-Present)是使用最广泛的悲痛测量工具之一;然而,研究人员仅在少数研究中通过实证检验了 TRIG-Present 评分的有效性和潜在的因子结构。因此,在本研究中,我们试图在两个丧亲的老年人群体样本中检验 TRIG-Present(那些表示当前悲痛的分数)的因子有效性——一个是由 162 名个体组成的社区居住样本,他们经历了与死者关系和失去时间的多样性丧失;另一个是最近丧偶的 212 名个体样本,他们在丧失后 2 个月和 12 个月进行了评估。在两个样本中,我们发现支持一个 3 因素模型,由代表对丧失的情绪反应、想法和不接受的项目群组成。此外,在最近丧偶的样本中,这个 3 因素模型从 2 个月到 12 个月后保持显著不变。对这 3 个因素的收敛有效性的分析也表明,这种对 TRIG-Present 的概念化可能具有实际优势,并可能影响临床医生和/或研究人员评估悲痛和评估丧亲干预的方式。