• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Factorial validity of the Texas Revised Inventory of Grief-Present scale among bereaved older adults.丧亲老年人 Texas 修订版悲痛量表-现量表的因子有效性。
Psychol Assess. 2010 Sep;22(3):675-87. doi: 10.1037/a0019914.
2
Assessment and Predictors of Grief Reactions among Bereaved Chinese Adults.丧亲的中国成年人的悲伤反应评估及预测因素。
J Palliat Med. 2018 Sep;21(9):1265-1271. doi: 10.1089/jpm.2018.0001. Epub 2018 Jun 18.
3
Psychometric evaluation of the Texas revised inventory of grief in a sample of bereaved family caregivers.对丧亲家庭照顾者样本进行的德克萨斯修订哀伤量表的心理测量评估。
Res Nurs Health. 2018 Oct;41(5):480-488. doi: 10.1002/nur.21886. Epub 2018 Oct 12.
4
[The TRIG (Texas Revised Inventory of Grief) questionnaire. French translation and validation].[《TRIG(德克萨斯修订哀伤量表)问卷》。法语翻译与验证]
Encephale. 1995 Jul-Aug;21(4):257-62.
5
The validation of the Texas revised inventory of grief on an older Latino sample.德州修订版悲伤量表在老年拉丁裔样本中的效度验证。
J Soc Work End Life Palliat Care. 2006;2(4):33-60. doi: 10.1300/j457v02n04_03.
6
Difficulties accepting the loss of a spouse: a precursor for intensified grieving among widowed older adults.难以接受配偶的离世:丧偶老年人悲痛加剧的前兆。
Death Stud. 2013 Feb;37(2):126-44. doi: 10.1080/07481187.2011.617489.
7
Complicated grief and bereavement-related depression as distinct disorders: preliminary empirical validation in elderly bereaved spouses.复杂悲伤和丧亲相关抑郁作为不同的疾病:老年丧偶配偶中的初步实证验证
Am J Psychiatry. 1995 Jan;152(1):22-30. doi: 10.1176/ajp.152.1.22.
8
[Grief experience by 154 young adults in the general population (value of the TRIG grief scale). Texas Revised Inventory of Grief].[154名普通人群中的年轻成年人的悲伤经历(TRIG悲伤量表的值)。德克萨斯修订悲伤量表]
Encephale. 1995 Jul-Aug;21(4):263-71.
9
Complicated grief, depression, and anxiety as distinct postloss syndromes: a confirmatory factor analysis study.复杂悲伤、抑郁和焦虑作为不同的丧亲后综合征:一项验证性因素分析研究。
Am J Psychiatry. 2005 Nov;162(11):2175-7. doi: 10.1176/appi.ajp.162.11.2175.
10
[Texas revised inventory of grief: adaptation to Spanish, reliability and validity].[德克萨斯修订版悲伤量表:西班牙语适应性、信度与效度]
Aten Primaria. 2005 Apr 30;35(7):353-8. doi: 10.1157/13074293.

引用本文的文献

1
Moving Toward Meaningful Evaluations of Monitoring in e-Mental Health Based on the Case of a Web-Based Grief Service for Older Mourners: Mixed Methods Study.迈向基于基于网络的老年丧亲者悲伤服务的电子心理健康监测有意义评估:混合方法研究。
JMIR Form Res. 2024 Nov 28;8:e63262. doi: 10.2196/63262.
2
Effects of a preventive parenting intervention for bereaved families on the intergenerational transmission of parenting attitudes: Mediating processes.一项针对丧偶家庭的预防性育儿干预对育儿态度代际传递的影响:中介过程。
Dev Psychopathol. 2023 Dec;35(5):2482-2498. doi: 10.1017/S0954579423000925. Epub 2023 Aug 10.
3
Adaptation and Validation of the Texas Revised Inventory of Grief-Present Scale.《德克萨斯修订版悲伤量表现状量表》的改编与验证
Health Psychol Res. 2022 Nov 30;10(4):39652. doi: 10.52965/001c.39652. eCollection 2022.
4
A Web-Based Self-help Intervention for Coping With the Loss of a Partner: Protocol for Randomized Controlled Trials in 3 Countries.一项基于网络的应对伴侣离世的自助干预措施:三个国家的随机对照试验方案
JMIR Res Protoc. 2022 Nov 30;11(11):e37827. doi: 10.2196/37827.
5
Protocol for the development and multisite validation of the Quality of Dying and Death-Revised Global Version scale.《濒死和死亡质量修订全球版本量表的制定和多中心验证方案》。
BMJ Open. 2022 Jul 25;12(7):e064508. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-064508.
6
The Role of Emotion Regulation and Loss-Related Coping Self-efficacy in an Internet Intervention for Grief: Mediation Analysis.情绪调节和丧失相关应对自我效能在悲伤的网络干预中的作用:中介分析
JMIR Ment Health. 2022 May 6;9(5):e27707. doi: 10.2196/27707.
7
Associations between informal care costs, care quality, carer rewards, burden and subsequent grief: the international, access, rights and empowerment mortality follow-back study of the last 3 months of life (IARE I study).非正式护理成本、护理质量、护理者回报、负担与后续悲痛之间的关联:国际、准入、权利和赋权生命回顾研究(IARE I 研究)中生命最后 3 个月的研究。
BMC Med. 2020 Nov 3;18(1):344. doi: 10.1186/s12916-020-01768-7.
8
Increased Amygdala Activations during the Emotional Experience of Death-Related Pictures in Complicated Grief: An fMRI Study.复杂悲伤中与死亡相关图片情感体验期间杏仁核激活增加:一项功能磁共振成像研究
J Clin Med. 2020 Mar 20;9(3):851. doi: 10.3390/jcm9030851.
9
Grief and Avoidant Death Attitudes Combine to Predict the Fading Affect Bias.悲伤和回避死亡态度的结合可以预测情感消退偏见。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2018 Aug 13;15(8):1736. doi: 10.3390/ijerph15081736.
10
Attentional Bias to Reminders of the Deceased as Compared With a Living Attachment in Grieving.悼念中对已故者提醒的注意力偏向与对现存依恋的比较。
Biol Psychiatry Cogn Neurosci Neuroimaging. 2018 Feb;3(2):107-115. doi: 10.1016/j.bpsc.2017.08.003. Epub 2017 Aug 24.

本文引用的文献

1
Structural Model Evaluation and Modification: An Interval Estimation Approach.结构模型评估与修正:一种区间估计方法。
Multivariate Behav Res. 1990 Apr 1;25(2):173-80. doi: 10.1207/s15327906mbr2502_4.
2
An examination of stage theory of grief among individuals bereaved by natural and violent causes: a meaning-oriented contribution.对自然和暴力原因导致丧亲的个体的悲伤阶段理论的考察:一种基于意义的贡献。
Omega (Westport). 2010;61(2):103-20. doi: 10.2190/OM.61.2.b.
3
Public health significance of neuroticism.神经质的公共卫生意义。
Am Psychol. 2009 May-Jun;64(4):241-56. doi: 10.1037/a0015309.
4
Outcomes from the Resources for Enhancing Alzheimer's Caregiver Health (REACH) program for bereaved caregivers.增强阿尔茨海默病照料者健康资源(REACH)项目为失去亲人的照料者带来的成果。
Psychol Aging. 2009 Mar;24(1):190-202. doi: 10.1037/a0014303.
5
Are normal and complicated grief different constructs? a confirmatory factor analytic test.正常悲伤和复杂悲伤是不同的概念吗?一项验证性因素分析测试。
Clin Psychol Psychother. 2008 Nov-Dec;15(6):386-95. doi: 10.1002/cpp.590.
6
Religion and spirituality in adjustment following bereavement: an integrative review.丧亲后调适过程中的宗教与精神性:一项整合性综述。
Death Stud. 2008;32(8):703-36. doi: 10.1080/07481180802289507.
7
What happens if we compare chopsticks with forks? The impact of making inappropriate comparisons in cross-cultural research.如果我们将筷子与叉子进行比较会怎样?在跨文化研究中进行不恰当比较的影响。
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2008 Nov;95(5):1005-18. doi: 10.1037/a0013193.
8
The effectiveness of psychotherapeutic interventions for bereaved persons: a comprehensive quantitative review.心理治疗干预对丧亲者的有效性:一项全面的定量综述。
Psychol Bull. 2008 Sep;134(5):648-661. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.134.5.648.
9
Complicated grief and uncomplicated grief are distinguishable constructs.复杂性悲伤和非复杂性悲伤是可区分的概念。
Psychiatry Res. 2008 Jan 15;157(1-3):311-4. doi: 10.1016/j.psychres.2007.05.013. Epub 2007 Oct 3.
10
Gender differences in depressive symptoms among older adults: a cross-national comparison: the CLESA project.老年人抑郁症状的性别差异:一项跨国比较:CLESA项目
Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol. 2007 Mar;42(3):198-207. doi: 10.1007/s00127-007-0158-3. Epub 2007 Feb 13.

丧亲老年人 Texas 修订版悲痛量表-现量表的因子有效性。

Factorial validity of the Texas Revised Inventory of Grief-Present scale among bereaved older adults.

机构信息

Department of Psychology, College of the Holy Cross, Worcester, MA 01610, USA.

出版信息

Psychol Assess. 2010 Sep;22(3):675-87. doi: 10.1037/a0019914.

DOI:10.1037/a0019914
PMID:20822280
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4336468/
Abstract

The Texas Revised Inventory of Grief-Present scale (TRIG-Present) is one of the most widely used grief measures; however, researchers have only empirically examined the validity and underlying factor structure of TRIG-Present scores in a few studies. Hence, in the present investigation, we sought to examine the factorial validity of the TRIG-Present (those scores that index current grief) among 2 samples of bereaved older adults--a community-dwelling sample of 162 individuals who experienced a diverse set of losses in terms of relationship to the deceased and time since loss, and a recently widowed sample of 212 individuals who were assessed at 2-months and 12-months postloss. Across both samples, we found support for a 3-factor model, composed of clusters of items representing Emotional Response, Thoughts, and Nonacceptance regarding a loss. Additionally, this 3-factor model exhibited significant invariance from 2-months to 12-months postloss in the recently widowed sample. Analyses examining the convergent validity of these 3 factors also suggest that this conceptualization of the TRIG-Present could have practical advantages and potentially influence the way in which clinicians and/or researchers assess grief and evaluate bereavement interventions.

摘要

德克萨斯修订悲痛量表-当前分量表(TRIG-Present)是使用最广泛的悲痛测量工具之一;然而,研究人员仅在少数研究中通过实证检验了 TRIG-Present 评分的有效性和潜在的因子结构。因此,在本研究中,我们试图在两个丧亲的老年人群体样本中检验 TRIG-Present(那些表示当前悲痛的分数)的因子有效性——一个是由 162 名个体组成的社区居住样本,他们经历了与死者关系和失去时间的多样性丧失;另一个是最近丧偶的 212 名个体样本,他们在丧失后 2 个月和 12 个月进行了评估。在两个样本中,我们发现支持一个 3 因素模型,由代表对丧失的情绪反应、想法和不接受的项目群组成。此外,在最近丧偶的样本中,这个 3 因素模型从 2 个月到 12 个月后保持显著不变。对这 3 个因素的收敛有效性的分析也表明,这种对 TRIG-Present 的概念化可能具有实际优势,并可能影响临床医生和/或研究人员评估悲痛和评估丧亲干预的方式。