Suppr超能文献

这个物体平衡吗?判断为安全起见。

Is this object balanced or unbalanced? Judgments are on the safe side.

机构信息

Faculté de Psychologie et des Sciences de l'Education, Université de Genève, Switzerland.

出版信息

J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2011 Apr;37(2):529-38. doi: 10.1037/a0018732.

Abstract

Do we perceive correctly whether a 2-D object is balanced or unbalanced? What would be the cause of biased equilibrium judgments? In two psychometric studies, we varied independently the characteristics of the objects and the equilibrium states. First, we observed that observers were excessively sensitive to the eccentricity of the object top. Second, we found that the subjective transition from "staying upright" to "falling" occurred before the object would have lost balance according to physical laws. To determine the role of naïve physics beliefs, we tested the effect of physical knowledge. Indeed, participants gave much less erroneous fall responses, once they were acquainted with the physical law. However, a slight bias remained that could not be attributed to an error in locating the position of the center of mass, as fall judgments occurred even when participants judged that the center of mass was above the object base. That is, participants seemed to act according to the principle that it is safer to judge that an object will fall though it would not, rather than making the opposite error.

摘要

我们是否能正确感知二维物体的平衡或不平衡状态?导致平衡判断出现偏差的原因是什么?在两项心理测量研究中,我们独立地改变了物体和平衡状态的特征。首先,我们观察到观察者对物体顶部的偏心非常敏感。其次,我们发现,根据物理定律,观察者主观上从“保持直立”到“倒下”的过渡发生在物体失去平衡之前。为了确定朴素物理信念的作用,我们测试了物理知识的效果。事实上,一旦参与者熟悉了物理定律,他们就会给出更少错误的倒下反应。然而,仍然存在一个轻微的偏差,这不能归因于对质心位置的定位错误,因为即使参与者判断质心在物体底座上方,倒下的判断也会发生。也就是说,参与者似乎是根据这样一个原则来行动的,即判断一个物体将要倒下虽然它不会,这样更安全,而不是犯相反的错误。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验