Cholewiak Steven A, Fleming Roland W, Singh Manish
Department of Psychology and Center for Cognitive Science, Rutgers University, New Brunswick, NJ, USA.
Department of Psychology, Justus-Liebig-University Giessen, Giessen, Germany.
J Vis. 2015 Feb 10;15(2):13. doi: 10.1167/15.2.13.
Humans can judge from vision alone whether an object is physically stable or not. Such judgments allow observers to predict the physical behavior of objects, and hence to guide their motor actions. We investigated the visual estimation of physical stability of 3-D objects (shown in stereoscopically viewed rendered scenes) and how it relates to visual estimates of their center of mass (COM). In Experiment 1, observers viewed an object near the edge of a table and adjusted its tilt to the perceived critical angle, i.e., the tilt angle at which the object was seen as equally likely to fall or return to its upright stable position. In Experiment 2, observers visually localized the COM of the same set of objects. In both experiments, observers' settings were compared to physical predictions based on the objects' geometry. In both tasks, deviations from physical predictions were, on average, relatively small. More detailed analyses of individual observers' settings in the two tasks, however, revealed mutual inconsistencies between observers' critical-angle and COM settings. The results suggest that observers did not use their COM estimates in a physically correct manner when making visual judgments of physical stability.
人类仅通过视觉就能判断一个物体在物理上是否稳定。这种判断使观察者能够预测物体的物理行为,从而指导他们的运动动作。我们研究了三维物体(在立体观看的渲染场景中显示)物理稳定性的视觉估计,以及它与物体质心(COM)视觉估计的关系。在实验1中,观察者观察桌子边缘附近的一个物体,并将其倾斜度调整到感知到的临界角度,即物体被视为同样可能掉落或恢复到直立稳定位置的倾斜角度。在实验2中,观察者通过视觉定位同一组物体的质心。在这两个实验中,将观察者的设置与基于物体几何形状的物理预测进行比较。在这两个任务中,平均而言,与物理预测的偏差相对较小。然而,对两个任务中个体观察者设置的更详细分析揭示了观察者临界角和质心设置之间的相互不一致。结果表明,观察者在对物理稳定性进行视觉判断时,没有以物理上正确的方式使用他们的质心估计。