Empilweni Services and Research Unit, Rahima Moosa Mother and Child Hospital, Johannesburg, South Africa.
JAMA. 2010 Sep 8;304(10):1082-90. doi: 10.1001/jama.2010.1278.
Protease inhibitor (PI)-based therapy is recommended for infants infected with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) who were exposed to nevirapine for prevention of mother-to-child HIV transmission. However, there are limitations of continuing PI-based therapy indefinitely and reuse of nevirapine has many advantages.
To test whether nevirapine-exposed infants who initially achieve viral suppression with PI-based therapy can maintain viral suppression when switched to nevirapine-based therapy.
DESIGN, SETTING, AND PATIENTS: Randomized trial conducted between April 2005 and May 2009 at a hospital in Johannesburg, South Africa, among 195 children who achieved viral suppression less than 400 copies/mL for 3 or more months from a cohort of 323 nevirapine-exposed children who initiated PI-based therapy before 24 months of age.
Control group children continued to receive ritonavir-boosted lopinavir, stavudine, and lamivudine (n = 99). Switch group children substituted nevirapine for ritonavir-boosted lopinavir (n = 96).
Children were followed up for 52 weeks after randomization. Plasma HIV-1 RNA of greater than 50 copies/mL was the primary end point. Confirmed viremia greater than 1000 copies/mL was used as a criterion to consider regimen changes for children in either group (safety end point).
Plasma viremia greater than 50 copies/mL occurred less frequently in the switch group (Kaplan-Meier probability, 0.438; 95% CI, 0.334-0.537) than in the control group (0.576; 95% CI, 0.470-0.668) (P = .02). Confirmed viremia greater than 1000 copies/mL occurred more frequently in the switch group (0.201; 95% CI, 0.125-0.289) than in the control group (0.022; 95% CI, 0.004-0.069) (P < .001). CD4 cell response was better in the switch group (median CD4 percentage at 52 weeks, 34.7) vs the control group (CD4 percentage, 31.3) (P = .004). Older age (relative hazard [RH], 1.71; 95% CI, 1.08-2.72) was associated with viremia greater than 50 copies/mL in the control group. Inadequate adherence (RH, 4.14; 95% CI, 1.18-14.57) and drug resistance (RH, 4.04; 95% CI, 1.40-11.65) before treatment were associated with confirmed viremia greater than 1000 copies/mL in the switch group.
Among HIV-infected children previously exposed to nevirapine, switching to nevirapine-based therapy after achieving viral suppression with a ritonavir-boosted lopinavir regimen resulted in lower rates of viremia greater than 50 copies/mL than maintaining the primary ritonavir-boosted lopinavir regimen.
clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT00117728.
对于因预防母婴传播而接受过奈韦拉平暴露的感染人类免疫缺陷病毒(HIV)的婴儿,建议采用蛋白酶抑制剂(PI)为基础的治疗。然而,无限期地继续采用 PI 为基础的治疗存在局限性,而重复使用奈韦拉平有许多优点。
检测最初采用 PI 为基础的治疗实现病毒抑制的奈韦拉平暴露婴儿,在转换为奈韦拉平为基础的治疗后能否维持病毒抑制。
设计、地点和患者:2005 年 4 月至 2009 年 5 月,在南非约翰内斯堡的一家医院进行了一项随机试验,共有 195 名婴儿入组,他们在接受 PI 为基础的治疗后 3 个月或以上,病毒载量小于 400 拷贝/mL,来自 323 名在 24 个月龄之前开始接受 PI 为基础的治疗的奈韦拉平暴露婴儿队列。
对照组儿童继续接受利托那韦增强洛匹那韦、司他夫定和拉米夫定治疗(n = 99)。转换组儿童用奈韦拉平替代利托那韦增强洛匹那韦(n = 96)。
儿童在随机分组后随访 52 周。血浆 HIV-1 RNA 大于 50 拷贝/mL 为主要终点。任一治疗组中儿童的病毒载量确认大于 1000 拷贝/mL 时,也作为改变治疗方案的标准(安全终点)。
转换组血浆病毒载量大于 50 拷贝/mL 的发生率(Kaplan-Meier 概率,0.438;95%置信区间,0.334-0.537)低于对照组(0.576;95%置信区间,0.470-0.668)(P =.02)。转换组病毒载量确认大于 1000 拷贝/mL 的发生率(0.201;95%置信区间,0.125-0.289)高于对照组(0.022;95%置信区间,0.004-0.069)(P <.001)。转换组 CD4 细胞反应较好(52 周时的中位数 CD4 百分比为 34.7),对照组为 CD4 百分比(31.3)(P =.004)。在对照组中,年龄较大(相对危险度 [RH],1.71;95%置信区间,1.08-2.72)与病毒载量大于 50 拷贝/mL 相关。在转换组中,治疗前依从性不足(RH,4.14;95%置信区间,1.18-14.57)和耐药性(RH,4.04;95%置信区间,1.40-11.65)与病毒载量确认大于 1000 拷贝/mL 相关。
在先前接受过奈韦拉平暴露的 HIV 感染儿童中,在利托那韦增强洛匹那韦方案治疗后实现病毒抑制后转换为奈韦拉平为基础的治疗,与维持主要的利托那韦增强洛匹那韦方案相比,病毒载量大于 50 拷贝/mL 的发生率较低。
clinicaltrials.gov 标识符:NCT00117728。