Hense H W, Kuulasmaa K, Zaborskis A, Kupsc W, Tuomilehto J
GSF-Medis Institute, Epidemiology Unit, Munich-Neuherberg, Federal Republic of Germany.
Rev Epidemiol Sante Publique. 1990;38(5-6):463-8.
In the WHO MONICA Project, cardiovascular risk factor surveys including measurements of arterial blood pressure (BP) were conducted in more than 50 different populations. In the course of a retrospective BP measurement quality assessment effort, two indicators of "prejudiced" blood pressure reading, last digit preference and high proportions of identical results in duplicate measurements, are used in addition to other items to evaluate blood pressure measurement quality. We used fictitious blood pressure distributions and applied to them Last Digit Preference scores and Proportions of Identical Duplicate Measurements actually found in the MONICA surveys. The analysis showed that Last Digit Preference affects predominantly the shape of the BP distribution curve, whereas high Proportions of Identical Duplicate Measurements may cause a shift of the entire BP distribution curve. Although the two items are partly interrelated, a clear distinction between them and their effects is advocated.
在世界卫生组织(WHO)的MONICA项目中,在50多个不同人群中开展了包括动脉血压(BP)测量在内的心血管危险因素调查。在一项回顾性血压测量质量评估工作中,除其他项目外,还使用了“有偏差”血压读数的两个指标,即末位数字偏好以及重复测量中相同结果的高比例,来评估血压测量质量。我们使用虚拟血压分布,并将MONICA调查中实际发现的末位数字偏好得分和重复测量相同结果的比例应用于这些分布。分析表明,末位数字偏好主要影响血压分布曲线的形状,而重复测量相同结果的高比例可能导致整个血压分布曲线的偏移。尽管这两个项目部分相关,但仍提倡对它们及其影响进行明确区分。