Suppr超能文献

心理治疗师对边缘型人格障碍的反应:核心冲突性关系主题分析。

Psychotherapists' response to borderline personality disorder: a core conflictual relationship theme analysis.

机构信息

Department of Psychology, University of Wollongong, Wollongong, Australia.

出版信息

Psychother Res. 2010 Nov;20(6):680-91. doi: 10.1080/10503307.2010.504242.

Abstract

This study examined therapists' emotional and cognitive responses to patients with borderline personality disorder (BPD) versus patients with major depressive disorder (MDD). Therapists' narratives (N=80) were elicited using the Relationship Anecdotes Paradigm interview method and then scored according to the core conflictual relationship theme-Leipzig/Ulm method (CCRT-LU; Albani et al., 2002). The emotional valences of therapists' responses were significantly more negative toward patients with BPD. Therapists differentially experienced patients with BPD as typically withdrawing and patients with MDD as attending within sessions. Therapists felt less satisfied in their therapeutic role with BPD despite a consistent wish to help patients. Findings support the utility of the CCRT-LU method in investigating therapist relational experiences and underscore the challenges for BPD treatment.

摘要

本研究考察了治疗师对边缘型人格障碍(BPD)患者与重性抑郁障碍(MDD)患者的情绪和认知反应。采用关系轶事范式访谈方法引出治疗师的叙述(N=80),然后根据核心冲突关系主题-莱比锡/乌尔姆方法(CCRT-LU;Albani 等人,2002)进行评分。治疗师对 BPD 患者的反应情绪明显更为消极。治疗师在治疗过程中不同程度地将 BPD 患者视为典型的回避者,而将 MDD 患者视为参与者。尽管他们一直希望帮助患者,但治疗师对 BPD 患者的治疗角色感到不太满意。研究结果支持 CCRT-LU 方法在调查治疗师关系体验方面的效用,并强调了 BPD 治疗的挑战。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验