Department of Zoology, University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand.
Conserv Biol. 2011 Feb;25(1):115-23. doi: 10.1111/j.1523-1739.2010.01574.x. Epub 2010 Sep 2.
The number of individuals translocated and released as part of a reintroduction is often small, as is the final established population, because the reintroduction site is typically small. Small founder and small resulting populations can result in population bottlenecks, which are associated with increased rates of inbreeding and loss of genetic diversity, both of which can affect the long-term viability of reintroduced populations. I used information derived from pedigrees of four monogamous bird species reintroduced onto two different islands (220 and 259 ha) in New Zealand to compare the pattern of inbreeding and loss of genetic diversity among the reintroduced populations. Although reintroduced populations founded with few individuals had higher levels of inbreeding, as predicted, other factors, including biased sex ratio and skewed breeding success, contributed to high levels of inbreeding and loss of genetic diversity. Of the 10-58 individuals released, 4-25 genetic founders contributed at least one living descendent and yielded approximately 3-11 founder-genome equivalents (number of genetic founders assuming an equal contribution of offspring and no random loss of alleles across generations) after seven breeding seasons. This range is much lower than the 20 founder-genome equivalents recommended for captive-bred populations. Although the level of inbreeding in one reintroduced population initially reached three times that of a closely related species, the long-term estimated rate of inbreeding of this one population was approximately one-third that of the other species due to differences in carrying capacities of the respective reintroduction sites. The increasing number of reintroductions to suitable areas that are smaller than those I examined here suggests that it might be useful to develop long-term strategies and guidelines for reintroduction programs, which would minimize inbreeding and maintain genetic diversity.
作为重新引入的一部分而迁移和释放的个体数量通常很少,最终建立的种群数量也很少,因为重新引入的地点通常很小。小的创始种群和由此产生的小种群可能导致种群瓶颈,这与近亲繁殖率增加和遗传多样性丧失有关,这两者都会影响重新引入种群的长期生存能力。我利用从新西兰两个不同岛屿(220 和 259 公顷)重新引入的四种单配制鸟类的系谱信息,比较了重新引入种群的近亲繁殖和遗传多样性丧失模式。尽管如预测的那样,以少数个体为基础建立的重新引入种群具有更高水平的近亲繁殖,但其他因素,包括性别比例偏斜和繁殖成功率偏斜,也导致了高水平的近亲繁殖和遗传多样性丧失。在释放的 10-58 个个体中,有 4-25 个遗传创始者至少贡献了一个活后代,在七个繁殖季节后产生了大约 3-11 个创始基因组当量(假设后代均等贡献且等位基因在各代中随机丢失的遗传创始者数量)。这个范围远低于建议的圈养种群 20 个创始基因组当量。尽管一个重新引入种群的近亲繁殖水平最初达到了与其密切相关物种的三倍,但由于各自重新引入地点的承载能力不同,该种群的长期估计近亲繁殖率约为另一个物种的三分之一。越来越多的重新引入到比我这里研究的更小的适宜地区表明,制定重新引入计划的长期策略和准则可能会很有用,这可以最大限度地减少近亲繁殖并保持遗传多样性。