在基础研究中使用有感知能力的动物是否合理？
Is the use of sentient animals in basic research justifiable?
作者信息
Greek Ray, Greek Jean
机构信息
Americans For Medical Advancement, Goleta, CA 93117, USA.
出版信息
Philos Ethics Humanit Med. 2010 Sep 8;5:14. doi: 10.1186/1747-5341-5-14.
Abstract
Animals can be used in many ways in science and scientific research. Given that society values sentient animals and that basic research is not goal oriented, the question is raised: "Is the use of sentient animals in basic research justifiable?" We explore this in the context of funding issues, outcomes from basic research, and the position of society as a whole on using sentient animals in research that is not goal oriented. We conclude that the use of sentient animals in basic research cannot be justified in light of society's priorities.
摘要
动物在科学及科学研究中有多种用途。鉴于社会重视有感知能力的动物，且基础研究并非目标导向型，于是就产生了这样一个问题：“在基础研究中使用有感知能力的动物是否合理？”我们从资金问题、基础研究成果以及整个社会对于在非目标导向型研究中使用有感知能力动物的立场等方面来探讨这一问题。我们得出结论，从社会的优先事项来看，在基础研究中使用有感知能力的动物是不合理的。
相似文献
1
Is the use of sentient animals in basic research justifiable?
Philos Ethics Humanit Med. 2010 Sep 8;5:14. doi: 10.1186/1747-5341-5-14.
2
Ethical issues in research: Human and animal experimentation.
J Pediatr Urol. 2018 Jun;14(3):286. doi: 10.1016/j.jpurol.2017.10.019. Epub 2017 Dec 2.
3
Ethical issues in research: Human and animal experimentation.
J Pediatr Urol. 2018 Jun;14(3):287-288. doi: 10.1016/j.jpurol.2017.12.012. Epub 2018 Feb 9.
4
A review of the Institute of Medicine's analysis of using chimpanzees in biomedical research.
Sci Eng Ethics. 2014 Jun;20(2):481-504. doi: 10.1007/s11948-013-9442-7. Epub 2013 Apr 25.
5
Biomedical research ethics.
J Med Philos. 2002 Oct;27(5):515-22. doi: 10.1076/jmep.27.5.515.10319.
6
Teaching ethics to basic scientists: suggestions for greater curricular clarity.
Am J Bioeth. 2002 Fall;2(4):62-3. doi: 10.1162/152651602320957646.
7
[Translational medicine and animal studies].
Lege Artis Med. 2009 Feb;19(2):164-6.
8
Experimentation on humans and nonhumans.
Theor Med Bioeth. 2006;27(4):333-55. doi: 10.1007/s11017-006-9009-6.
9
[Ethical issue in animal experimentation].
Bull Acad Natl Med. 2009 Nov;193(8):1737-45; discussion 1746.
10
Animals and ethical research.
Regul Toxicol Pharmacol. 2014 Dec;70(3):575-6. doi: 10.1016/j.yrtph.2014.10.001. Epub 2014 Oct 19.
引用本文的文献
1
Burning down the house: reinventing drug discovery in psychiatry for the development of targeted therapies.
Mol Psychiatry. 2023 Jan;28(1):68-75. doi: 10.1038/s41380-022-01887-y. Epub 2022 Dec 2.
2
Harm-Benefit Analysis May Not Be the Best Approach to Ensure Minimal Harms and Maximal Benefits of Animal Research-Alternatives Should Be Explored.
Animals (Basel). 2020 Feb 12;10(2):291. doi: 10.3390/ani10020291.
3
Modeling the Tumor Microenvironment and Pathogenic Signaling in Bone Sarcoma.
Tissue Eng Part B Rev. 2020 Jun;26(3):249-271. doi: 10.1089/ten.teb.2019.0302. Epub 2020 Feb 14.
4
Joining forces: the need to combine science and ethics to address problems of validity and translation in neuropsychiatry research using animal models.
Philos Ethics Humanit Med. 2020 Jan 23;15(1):1. doi: 10.1186/s13010-019-0085-4.
5
Critical evaluation of challenges and future use of animals in experimentation for biomedical research.
Int J Immunopathol Pharmacol. 2016 Dec;29(4):551-561. doi: 10.1177/0394632016671728. Epub 2016 Sep 30.
6
The flaws and human harms of animal experimentation.
Camb Q Healthc Ethics. 2015 Oct;24(4):407-19. doi: 10.1017/S0963180115000079.
7
The Three Rs of Animal Research: What they Mean for the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee and Why.
Sci Eng Ethics. 2016 Apr;22(2):549-65. doi: 10.1007/s11948-015-9659-8. Epub 2015 May 31.
8
Letter to the editor.
Theor Med Bioeth. 2014 Oct;35(5):389-94. doi: 10.1007/s11017-014-9305-5.
9
A review of the Institute of Medicine's analysis of using chimpanzees in biomedical research.
Sci Eng Ethics. 2014 Jun;20(2):481-504. doi: 10.1007/s11948-013-9442-7. Epub 2013 Apr 25.
10
Systematic reviews of animal models: methodology versus epistemology.
Int J Med Sci. 2013;10(3):206-21. doi: 10.7150/ijms.5529. Epub 2013 Jan 11.
本文引用的文献
1
A slippery slope.
Nature. 2009 Dec 10;462(7274):699. doi: 10.1038/462699b.
2
Tailoring antiplatelet therapy based on pharmacogenomics: how well do the data fit?
JAMA. 2009 Aug 26;302(8):896-7. doi: 10.1001/jama.2009.1249.
3
Association of cytochrome P450 2C19 genotype with the antiplatelet effect and clinical efficacy of clopidogrel therapy.
JAMA. 2009 Aug 26;302(8):849-57. doi: 10.1001/jama.2009.1232.
4
HIV gender clues emerge.
Nat Med. 2009 Aug;15(8):830. doi: 10.1038/nm0809-830b.
5
Immunologic aspects of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.
N Engl J Med. 2009 Jun 4;360(23):2445-54. doi: 10.1056/NEJMra0804752.
6
The next innovation revolution.
Science. 2009 Feb 27;323(5918):1147. doi: 10.1126/science.1170834.
7
Are animal models predictive for humans?
Philos Ethics Humanit Med. 2009 Jan 15;4:2. doi: 10.1186/1747-5341-4-2.
8
Creating and evaluating genetic tests predictive of drug response.
Nat Rev Drug Discov. 2008 Jul;7(7):568-74. doi: 10.1038/nrd2520. Epub 2008 Jun 20.
9
Translational research: the full cycle.
Nature. 2008 Jun 12;453(7197):843-5. doi: 10.1038/453843a.
10
Translational research: crossing the valley of death.
Nature. 2008 Jun 12;453(7197):840-2. doi: 10.1038/453840a.
Zotero 插件