Rehabilitation Medicine Department, National Institutes of Health Clinical Center, Bethesda, MD, USA.
Top Stroke Rehabil. 2010 Jul-Aug;17(4):230-8. doi: 10.1310/tsr1704-230.
Given the numerous quality improvement (QI) initiatives that have been undertaken in various medical fields, it is clear that inpatient rehabilitation services, particularly those geared toward stroke rehabilitation, can also benefit from these programs. To effectively evaluate the quality of rehabilitation services, indicators measuring structure, process, and outcomes must be included as part of any QI initiative. In addition to measuring quality, these indicators can be used to describe and address disparities in the provision of rehabilitation services on the basis of race, socioeconomic status, geography, disability status, and a multitude of other demographic factors. To improve quality and address health disparities associated with stroke rehabilitation, QI initiatives must be scientifically driven, continuing the trend of evidence-based practice in medicine. They must also remain flexible, because the science of quality improvement is an ever-changing field. It will be a challenge to convince physicians and other health care professionals that QI initiatives are a worthwhile investment of their limited time and resources, and further research is required to move the field of quality in stroke rehabilitation forward.
鉴于在各个医学领域已经开展了众多质量改进 (QI) 计划,显然,住院康复服务,特别是针对中风康复的服务,也可以从这些计划中受益。为了有效地评估康复服务的质量,作为任何 QI 计划的一部分,必须包括衡量结构、过程和结果的指标。除了衡量质量外,这些指标还可以用于根据种族、社会经济地位、地理位置、残疾状况和众多其他人口统计因素,描述和解决康复服务提供方面的差异。为了提高质量并解决与中风康复相关的健康差异,QI 计划必须具有科学性,延续医学循证实践的趋势。它们还必须保持灵活性,因为质量改进的科学是一个不断变化的领域。要使医生和其他医疗保健专业人员相信 QI 计划是对他们有限的时间和资源的一项有价值的投资,这将是一个挑战,还需要进一步的研究来推动中风康复领域的质量发展。