Suppr超能文献

一份儿童医疗保健质量改进的成绩单。

A report card on quality improvement for children's health care.

作者信息

Ferris T G, Dougherty D, Blumenthal D, Perrin J M

机构信息

Institute for Health Policy, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.

出版信息

Pediatrics. 2001 Jan;107(1):143-55. doi: 10.1542/peds.107.1.143.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Improving the quality of health care is a national priority. Nonetheless, no systematic effort has assessed the status of quality improvement (QI) initiatives for children or reviewed past research in child health care QI. This assessment is necessary to establish priorities for QI programs and research.

METHODS

To assess the status of QI initiatives and research, we reviewed the literature and interviewed experts experienced in QI for child health services. We defined QI as activities intended to close the gap between desired processes and outcomes of care and what is actually delivered. We classified reports published between 1985 and 1997 by publication characteristics, study design, clinical problem addressed, site of intervention, the QI method(s) used, and explicit association with a continuous quality improvement program.

RESULTS

We reviewed 68 reports meeting our definition of QI. More than half (48) were published after 1994. The reviewed reports included controlled evaluations in 36% of all identified interventions, and 3% of the reports were associated with continuous quality improvement. QI methods demonstrating some effectiveness included reminder systems for office-based preventive services and inpatient pathways for complex care. Reportedly successful QI initiatives more commonly described improvement in administrative measures such as rate of hospitalization or length of stay rather than functional status or quality of life. Interviews found that barriers to QI for children were similar to those for adults, but were compounded by difficulties in measuring child health outcomes, limited resources among public organizations and small provider groups, and relative lack of competition for pediatric tertiary care providers. Research and dissemination of QI for children were seen as less well developed than for adults.

CONCLUSIONS

Attempts to improve the quality of child health services have been increasing, and the evidence we reviewed suggests that it is possible to improve the quality of care for children. Nonetheless, numerous gaps remain in the understanding of QI for children, and widespread improvement in the quality of health services for children faces significant barriers.

摘要

目的

提高医疗保健质量是国家的一项优先任务。尽管如此,尚未有系统的工作对儿童质量改进(QI)举措的现状进行评估,也未对过去儿童医疗保健QI方面的研究进行综述。这种评估对于确定QI项目和研究的优先事项是必要的。

方法

为评估QI举措和研究的现状,我们查阅了文献,并采访了在儿童健康服务QI方面有经验的专家。我们将QI定义为旨在缩小期望的医疗过程和结果与实际提供的情况之间差距的活动。我们根据发表特征、研究设计、所解决的临床问题、干预地点、所使用的QI方法以及与持续质量改进项目的明确关联,对1985年至1997年间发表的报告进行了分类。

结果

我们查阅了68份符合我们QI定义的报告。超过一半(48份)是1994年以后发表的。所查阅的报告中,36%的所有已确定干预措施包含对照评估,3%的报告与持续质量改进相关。显示出一定效果的QI方法包括基于办公室的预防服务提醒系统和复杂护理的住院路径。据报道成功的QI举措更常描述的是行政措施方面的改善,如住院率或住院时间,而非功能状态或生活质量。访谈发现,儿童QI的障碍与成人的类似,但因测量儿童健康结果存在困难、公共组织和小型医疗服务提供团体资源有限以及儿科三级医疗服务提供者相对缺乏竞争而更加复杂。儿童QI的研究和传播被认为比成人的发展程度低。

结论

提高儿童健康服务质量的尝试一直在增加,我们查阅的证据表明提高儿童护理质量是可能的。尽管如此,在对儿童QI的理解方面仍存在许多差距,儿童健康服务质量的广泛提高面临重大障碍。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验