Wong Ivan, Vuylsteke Alain
School of Clinical Medicine, University of Cambridge, UK.
Perfusion. 2011 Jan;26(1):7-20. doi: 10.1177/0267659110383342. Epub 2010 Sep 8.
A large proportion of critically ill H1N1/2009 patients with respiratory failure subsequently developed ARDS and, to date, about 400 patients receiving extracorporeal life support (ECLS) have been accounted for globally, with a reported survival rate from 63% to 79%. The survival rates of patients with ARDS due to non-H1N1/2009 infections are similar. There is no definite evidence to suggest that patient outcomes are changed by ECLS, but its use is associated with serious short-term complications. ECLS relies on an extracorporeal circuit, with extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) and pumpless interventional lung assist (ILA) being the two major types employed in ARDS. Both have the potential to correct respiratory failure and related haemodynamic instability. There are only a very limited number of clinical trials to test either and, although ECLS has been used in treating H1N1/2009 patients with ARDS with some success, it should only be offered in the context of clinical trials and in experienced centres.
很大一部分患有呼吸衰竭的重症2009年甲型H1N1流感患者随后发展为急性呼吸窘迫综合征(ARDS),迄今为止,全球约有400例接受体外生命支持(ECLS)的患者,报告的生存率在63%至79%之间。非2009年甲型H1N1流感感染所致ARDS患者的生存率与之相似。没有确切证据表明ECLS会改变患者的预后,但使用它会伴有严重的短期并发症。ECLS依靠体外循环,体外膜肺氧合(ECMO)和无泵介入肺辅助(ILA)是ARDS中使用的两种主要类型。两者都有纠正呼吸衰竭和相关血流动力学不稳定的潜力。用于测试二者的临床试验数量非常有限,尽管ECLS已成功用于治疗患有ARDS的2009年甲型H1N1流感患者,但仅应在临床试验背景下且在经验丰富的中心使用。