Department of Radiology, Institute of Gastroenterology, Research Institute of Radiological Science, Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seodaemun-ku, Shinchon-dong 134, Seoul 120-752, South Korea.
Radiology. 2010 Nov;257(2):384-93. doi: 10.1148/radiol.10100200. Epub 2010 Sep 9.
To define the differential imaging features of pancreatobiliary- and intestinal-type ampullary carcinomas at magnetic resonance (MR) imaging and to correlate these features with pathologic findings.
This retrospective study was approved by the institutional review board; informed consent was waived. Fifty patients with surgically confirmed ampullary carcinoma and preoperative MR results were included. Two radiologists, blinded to histologic type of cancer, evaluated imaging findings in consensus. Univariate and multiple logistic regression analysis were performed to define imaging findings that were useful for differentiation of the two types of carcinomas.
On the basis of hematoxylin-eosin and immunohistochemical staining, 35 patients were classified as having pancreatobiliary type; and 15 patients, intestinal type. At MR, all of 15 intestinal carcinomas were nodular, whereas 16 (46%) of 35 pancreatobiliary carcinomas were infiltrative. Intestinal carcinomas were isointense (13 [87%] of 15) to hyperintense (two [13%] of 15), whereas 34% (12 of 35) of pancreatobiliary carcinomas manifested as hypointense compared with the duodenum on T2-weighted MR images (P = .034). Intestinal carcinoma commonly manifested with an oval filling defect at the distal end of the bile duct on MR cholangiopancreatographic (MRCP) images (11 [73%] of 15 vs four [11%] of 35 in pancreatobiliary type) (P < .001). At endoscopy, intestinal carcinoma manifested with an extramural protruding mass (n = 15, 100%) with a papillary surface (n = 11, 73%), whereas pancreatobiliary carcinoma manifested with intramural protruding (n = 5, 28%) or ulcerating (n = 1, 6%) gross morphologic features (P = .047) with a nonpapillary surface (n = 17, 94%) (P < .001). Multiple logistic regression analysis showed that an oval filling defect at the distal end of the bile duct was the only independent finding for differentiating intestinal from pancreatobiliary carcinoma (P = .027).
An oval filling defect at the distal end of the bile duct on MRCP images and an extramural protruding appearance with a papillary surface at endoscopy are likely to suggest intestinal ampullary carcinoma.
在磁共振成像(MR)中定义胰胆管型和肠型壶腹癌的差异成像特征,并将这些特征与病理发现相关联。
本回顾性研究经机构审查委员会批准;豁免了知情同意。共纳入 50 例经手术证实的壶腹癌患者和术前 MR 结果。两位放射科医生在不知道癌症组织学类型的情况下,对影像学结果进行了共识评估。进行了单变量和多变量逻辑回归分析,以确定对两种类型的癌症进行区分有用的影像学发现。
根据苏木精-伊红和免疫组织化学染色,35 例患者被归类为胰胆管型;15 例患者为肠型。在 MR 上,所有 15 例肠型癌均为结节状,而 35 例胰胆管型癌中有 16 例(46%)为浸润性。肠型癌在 T2 加权 MR 图像上与十二指肠等信号(13[87%]例 15 例)或高信号(2[13%]例 15 例),而 34%(12 例 35 例)的胰胆管型癌表现为低信号(P=.034)。肠型癌在 MR 胆胰管成像(MRCP)图像上常表现为胆总管末端的椭圆形充盈缺损(15 例 11[73%]例 vs 胰胆管型 35 例 4[11%]例)(P<.001)。在内镜下,肠型癌表现为外生突出肿块(n=15,100%),表面呈乳头状(n=11,73%),而胰胆管型癌表现为腔内突出(n=5,28%)或溃疡性(n=1,6%)大体形态特征(P=.047),表面无乳头状(n=17,94%)(P<.001)。多变量逻辑回归分析显示,胆总管末端的椭圆形充盈缺损是区分肠型和胰胆管型癌的唯一独立发现(P=.027)。
MRCP 图像上胆总管末端的椭圆形充盈缺损和内镜下的外生突出外观伴乳头状表面很可能提示肠型壶腹癌。