Subramaniam Priya, Kondae Sapna, Gupta Kamal Kishore
Department of Pedodontics and Preventive Dentistry, The Oxford Dental College, Hospitaland Research Centre, Bommanahalli, Hosur Road Bangalore-560068, Karnataka, India.
J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2010 Summer;34(4):309-12. doi: 10.17796/jcpd.34.4.p5h1068v41ggt450.
The present study evaluated and compared the retentive strength of three luting cements. A total of forty five freshly extracted human primary molars were used in this study. The teeth were prepared to receive stainless steel crowns. They were then randomly divided into three groups, of fifteen teeth each, so as to receive the three different luting cements: conventional glass ionomer resin modified glass ionomer and adhesive resin. The teeth were then stored in artificial saliva for twenty four hours. The retentive strength of the crowns was determined by using a specially designed Instron Universal Testing Machine (Model 1011). The data was statistically analyzed using ANOVA to evaluate retentive strength for each cement and Tukey test for pair wise comparison. It was concluded that retentive strength of adhesive resin cement and resin modified glass ionomer cement was significantly higher than that of the conventional glass ionomer cement.
本研究评估并比较了三种粘结水门汀的固位强度。本研究共使用了45颗新鲜拔除的人类乳牙。对这些牙齿进行预备以安装不锈钢冠。然后将它们随机分为三组,每组15颗牙齿,以便使用三种不同的粘结水门汀:传统玻璃离子水门汀、树脂改性玻璃离子水门汀和粘结树脂。然后将牙齿在人工唾液中保存24小时。使用专门设计的英斯特朗万能材料试验机(型号1011)测定冠的固位强度。使用方差分析对数据进行统计学分析,以评估每种水门汀的固位强度,并使用Tukey检验进行两两比较。得出的结论是,粘结树脂水门汀和树脂改性玻璃离子水门汀的固位强度明显高于传统玻璃离子水门汀。