• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

四种粘结水门汀与不锈钢冠用于乳磨牙固位强度的评估:一项研究。

Evaluation of retentive strength of four luting cements with stainless steel crowns in primary molars: An study.

作者信息

Parisay Iman, Khazaei Yegane

机构信息

Dental Material Research Center, School of Dentistry, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran.

Department of Oral Hygiene, School of Hygiene, Torbat Heydarieh University of Medical Sciences, Torbat Heidariye, Iran.

出版信息

Dent Res J (Isfahan). 2018 May-Jun;15(3):201-207.

PMID:29922339
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5958537/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Stainless steel crown (SSC) is the most reliable restoration for primary teeth with extensive caries. Retention is of great importance for a successful restoration and is provided by various factors such as luting cements. The aim of this study was to evaluate the retentive strength of SSC cemented with four different luting cements.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

In this study, A total of 55 extracted primary first molars were selected. Following crown selection and cementation (one with no cement and four groups cemented with resin, glass ionomer, zinc phosphate, and polycarboxylate), all the specimens were incubated and thermocycled in 5°C-55°C. Retentive properties of SSCs were tested with a mechanical test machine. First dislodgement of each specimen and full crown removal were recorded. One-way ANOVA test followed by least significant difference test and Kruskal-Wallis test was used for retentive strength comparison at the level of significance of < 0.05.

RESULTS

The results of the study showed that the specimens cemented with zinc phosphate exhibited higher retentive strength as compared to glass ionomer and polycarboxylate ( < 0.001 and = 0.023, respectively).

CONCLUSION

Zinc phosphate cement showed the most promising results; thus, it can be preferably used for cementation of the teeth with no grossly broken down crowns.

摘要

背景

不锈钢冠(SSC)是治疗广泛龋坏乳牙最可靠的修复体。固位对于成功修复至关重要,多种因素如粘结水门汀可提供固位力。本研究旨在评估用四种不同粘结水门汀粘结的SSC的固位强度。

材料与方法

本研究共选取55颗拔除的乳牙第一磨牙。在选择牙冠并进行粘结后(一组不使用粘结剂,四组分别用树脂、玻璃离子水门汀、磷酸锌水门汀和聚羧酸锌水门汀粘结),所有标本在5°C - 55°C下进行孵育和热循环处理。用机械试验机测试SSC的固位性能。记录每个标本的首次脱位和全冠去除情况。采用单因素方差分析,随后进行最小显著差检验和Kruskal - Wallis检验,以比较在显著性水平<0.05时的固位强度。

结果

研究结果表明,与玻璃离子水门汀和聚羧酸锌水门汀相比,用磷酸锌水门汀粘结的标本表现出更高的固位强度(分别为<0.001和 = 0.023)。

结论

磷酸锌水门汀显示出最有前景的结果;因此,它可优选用于粘结牙冠未严重损坏的牙齿。

相似文献

1
Evaluation of retentive strength of four luting cements with stainless steel crowns in primary molars: An study.四种粘结水门汀与不锈钢冠用于乳磨牙固位强度的评估:一项研究。
Dent Res J (Isfahan). 2018 May-Jun;15(3):201-207.
2
Comparative Evaluation of Bond Strength of Different Luting Cements for Cementation of Stainless Steel Bands on Primary Molar Crowns (Stainless Steel and Zirconia Crowns): An Study.不同粘结水门汀在乳牙牙冠上粘结不锈钢带(不锈钢和氧化锆冠)的粘结强度比较评估:一项研究。
Int J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2021 Nov-Dec;14(6):762-767. doi: 10.5005/jp-journals-10005-2003.
3
A comparative study of retentive strengths of zinc phosphate, polycarboxylate and glass ionomer cements with stainless steel crowns - an in vitro study.磷酸锌水门汀、聚羧酸锌水门汀和玻璃离子水门汀与不锈钢冠固位强度的比较研究——一项体外研究。
J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent. 2010 Oct-Dec;28(4):245-50. doi: 10.4103/0970-4388.76150.
4
The effect of retentive groove, sandblasting and cement type on the retentive strength of stainless steel crowns in primary second molars--an in vitro comparative study.固位沟、喷砂处理及黏固剂类型对乳第二磨牙不锈钢全冠固位强度的影响——一项体外对比研究
J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent. 2012 Jan-Mar;30(1):19-26. doi: 10.4103/0970-4388.95570.
5
Evaluation of Stainless Steel Crowns cemented with Resin-modified Glass Ionomer and Two New Self-adhesive Resin Cements.用树脂改性玻璃离子水门汀和两种新型自粘结树脂水门汀粘结的不锈钢冠的评价
Int J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2016 Jul-Sep;9(3):197-200. doi: 10.5005/jp-journals-10005-1363. Epub 2016 Sep 27.
6
Evaluation of stainless steel crowns cemented with glass-ionomer and resin-modified glass-ionomer luting cements.用玻璃离子水门汀和树脂改性玻璃离子水门汀粘结的不锈钢冠的评估。
Am J Dent. 2006 Apr;19(2):106-10.
7
Retentive [correction of Preventive] efficacy of glass ionomer, zinc phosphate and zinc polycarboxylate luting cements in preformed stainless steel crowns: a comparative clinical study.玻璃离子水门汀、磷酸锌水门汀和聚羧酸锌水门汀在预成不锈钢冠中的固位[纠正为预防]效果:一项比较临床研究。
J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent. 2002 Jun;20(2):41-6.
8
Retentive strength of luting cements for stainless steel crowns: A systematic review.不锈钢冠用粘结水门汀的固位强度:一项系统评价。
J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent. 2020 Jan-Mar;38(1):2-7. doi: 10.4103/JISPPD.JISPPD_313_19.
9
A comparative study of retentive strengths of zinc phosphate, polycarboxylate and glass ionomer cements with stainless steel crowns--an in vitro study.磷酸锌水门汀、聚羧酸锌水门汀和玻璃离子水门汀与不锈钢冠固位强度的比较研究——一项体外研究。
J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent. 1998 Mar;16(1):9-11.
10
In vitro retentive strength of zirconium oxide ceramic crowns using different luting agents.使用不同粘结剂的氧化锆陶瓷冠的体外固位强度
J Prosthet Dent. 2005 Jun;93(6):551-8. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2005.04.011.

引用本文的文献

1
Retention of Bioflx, Zirconia, and Stainless Steel crowns using two different luting cements in primary molars: an in vitro study.在乳磨牙中使用两种不同粘结水门汀对Bioflx、氧化锆和不锈钢全冠的固位:一项体外研究。
BMC Oral Health. 2025 Aug 15;25(1):1328. doi: 10.1186/s12903-025-06671-2.
2
Retention of Pediatric BioFlx Crowns Versus Stainless Steel Crowns Using Different Types of Luting Cements: An In Vitro Study.使用不同类型黏固剂时儿童BioFlx冠与不锈钢冠的固位情况:一项体外研究
Materials (Basel). 2025 Mar 14;18(6):1287. doi: 10.3390/ma18061287.
3
Comparative Evaluation of the Bond Strength Between Bioflx, Stainless Steel Crowns, and Stainless Steel Bands Using Type 1 Glass Ionomer Cement and Resin-modified Glass Ionomer Cement as Luting Agents: An Study.

本文引用的文献

1
Evaluation of Stainless Steel Crowns cemented with Resin-modified Glass Ionomer and Two New Self-adhesive Resin Cements.用树脂改性玻璃离子水门汀和两种新型自粘结树脂水门汀粘结的不锈钢冠的评价
Int J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2016 Jul-Sep;9(3):197-200. doi: 10.5005/jp-journals-10005-1363. Epub 2016 Sep 27.
2
A Review of Glass-Ionomer Cements for Clinical Dentistry.玻璃离子水门汀在临床牙科中的应用综述。
J Funct Biomater. 2016 Jun 28;7(3):16. doi: 10.3390/jfb7030016.
3
The use of stainless steel crowns: a systematic literature review.不锈钢冠的应用:一项系统的文献综述
使用1型玻璃离子水门汀和树脂改性玻璃离子水门汀作为粘结剂对Bioflx、不锈钢冠和不锈钢带之间粘结强度的比较评估:一项研究。
Int J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2025 Jan;18(1):70-74. doi: 10.5005/jp-journals-10005-3026. Epub 2025 Feb 14.
4
Current Trends for Cementation in Prosthodontics: Part 1-The Substrate.口腔修复学中粘结技术的当前趋势:第1部分——粘结基底
Polymers (Basel). 2025 Feb 20;17(5):566. doi: 10.3390/polym17050566.
5
An Evaluation of Mechanical Properties of a New Dual-cure, Universal, Bioactive Luting Cement.一种新型双固化通用生物活性粘接水门汀的力学性能评估
Int J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2024 Aug;17(8):887-891. doi: 10.5005/jp-journals-10005-2914.
6
Evaluation and Comparison of Two Different Cleaning Procedures on Mechanical Properties for Recemented Restoration Using Two Conventional Glass Ionomer Cement Types: An In Vitro Study.使用两种传统玻璃离子水门汀对粘结修复体的力学性能进行两种不同清洁程序的评估与比较:一项体外研究。
Cureus. 2022 Nov 30;14(11):e32044. doi: 10.7759/cureus.32044. eCollection 2022 Nov.
7
Comparative Evaluation of Bond Strength of Different Luting Cements for Cementation of Stainless Steel Bands on Primary Molar Crowns (Stainless Steel and Zirconia Crowns): An Study.不同粘结水门汀在乳牙牙冠上粘结不锈钢带(不锈钢和氧化锆冠)的粘结强度比较评估:一项研究。
Int J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2021 Nov-Dec;14(6):762-767. doi: 10.5005/jp-journals-10005-2003.
8
Bond strength and microleakage of different types of cements in stainless steel crown of primary molar teeth.乳牙不锈钢冠中不同类型粘结剂的粘结强度和微渗漏
Dent Res J (Isfahan). 2021 Jul 19;18:58. eCollection 2021.
9
comparison of marginal and internal fit between stainless steel crowns and esthetic crowns of primary molars using different luting cements.使用不同粘结剂时,不锈钢冠和乳磨牙美学冠的边缘适合性与内部适合性比较。
Dent Res J (Isfahan). 2019 Nov 12;16(6):366-371. eCollection 2019 Nov-Dec.
Pediatr Dent. 2015 Mar-Apr;37(2):145-60.
4
Practical clinical considerations of luting cements: A review.粘结水门汀的临床实际考量:综述
J Int Oral Health. 2014 Feb;6(1):116-20. Epub 2014 Feb 26.
5
An in vitro study to compare the effect of two etching techniques on the tensile bond strength of resin cement bonded to base metal alloy and enamel.一项体外研究,旨在比较两种酸蚀技术对树脂水门汀与贱金属合金及牙釉质之间拉伸粘结强度的影响。
J Indian Prosthodont Soc. 2013 Dec;13(4):486-93. doi: 10.1007/s13191-012-0214-x. Epub 2012 Dec 11.
6
Self-adhesive resin cements: a new perspective in luting technology.自粘树脂水门汀:粘接技术的新视角。
Dent Update. 2013 Nov;40(9):758-60, 763-4, 767-8. doi: 10.12968/denu.2013.40.9.758.
7
In vitro shear bond strength of three self-adhesive resin cements and a resin-modified glass ionomer cement to various prosthodontic substrates.三种自粘接树脂水门汀和一种树脂改性玻璃离子水门汀与各种义齿基托材料的体外剪切粘结强度。
Oper Dent. 2013 Mar-Apr;38(2):186-96. doi: 10.2341/11-317-L. Epub 2012 Aug 22.
8
Current dental adhesives systems. A narrative review.当前的牙科粘结剂系统。一种叙述性综述。
Curr Pharm Des. 2012;18(34):5542-52. doi: 10.2174/138161212803307491.
9
Microleakage of adhesive and nonadhesive luting cements for stainless steel crowns.不锈钢冠用粘结性和非粘结性粘结水门汀的微渗漏
Pediatr Dent. 2011 Nov-Dec;33(7):501-4.
10
A comparative study of retentive strengths of zinc phosphate, polycarboxylate and glass ionomer cements with stainless steel crowns - an in vitro study.磷酸锌水门汀、聚羧酸锌水门汀和玻璃离子水门汀与不锈钢冠固位强度的比较研究——一项体外研究。
J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent. 2010 Oct-Dec;28(4):245-50. doi: 10.4103/0970-4388.76150.