Center for Biomolecules and Complex Systems and Institute of Organic Chemistry and Biochemistry, 16610, Prague 6, Academy of Sciences of the CzechRepublic,
J Phys Chem A. 2010 Oct 28;114(42):11304-11. doi: 10.1021/jp104411x.
The noncovalent interactions of heteroboranes with aromatic systems have only recently been acknowledged as a source of stabilization in supramolecular complexes. The physical basis of these interactions has been studied in several model complexes using advanced computational methods. The highly accurate CCSD(T)/complete basis set (CBS) value of the interaction energy for the model diborane···benzene complex in a stacking geometry exhibiting a B(2)H···π hydrogen bond was calculated to be -4.0 kcal·mol(-1). The DFT-SAPT/CBS approach, which is shown to reproduce the CCSD(T)/CBS data reliably asserted that the major stabilizing component was dispersion, followed by electrostatics. Furthermore, the effect of the benzene heteroatom- and exosubstitutions was studied and found to be small. Next, when aromatic molecules were changed to cyclic aliphatic ones, van der Waals complexes stabilized by the dispersion term only were formed. As the last step, interactions of two larger icosahedral borane cages with benzene were explored. The complex of the monoanionic CB(11)H(12)(-) exhibited two minima: the first stacked above the plane of the benzene ring with a C-H···π hydrogen bond and the second planar, in which the carborane cage bound to benzene via five B-H···H-C dihydrogen bonds. The DFT-SAPT/CBS calculations revealed that both of these binding motifs were stabilized by dispersion followed by electrostatic terms, with the planar complex being 1.4 kcal·mol(-1) more stable than the stacked one. The dianionic B(12)H(12)(2-) interacted with benzene only in the planar geometry, similarly as smaller anions do. The large stabilization energy of 11.0 kcal·mol(-1) was composed of dominant attractive dispersion and slightly smaller electrostatic and induction terms. In summary, the borane/carborane···aromatic interaction is varied both in the complex geometries and in the stabilizing energy components. The detailed insight derived from high-level quantum chemical computations can help us understand such important processes as host-guest complexation or carborane···biomolecule interactions.
杂硼烷与芳环体系的非共价相互作用最近才被认为是超分子络合物稳定化的一个来源。这些相互作用的物理基础已经在几个使用先进计算方法的模型络合物中进行了研究。具有堆叠几何形状的模型二硼烷···苯络合物的相互作用能的高精度 CCSD(T)/完全基组 (CBS) 值计算为-4.0 kcal·mol(-1)。DFT-SAPT/CBS 方法可靠地再现了 CCSD(T)/CBS 数据,表明主要的稳定成分是色散,其次是静电。此外,还研究了苯杂原子和外向取代基的影响,发现影响很小。接下来,当芳香族分子变为环状脂肪族分子时,仅由色散项稳定的范德华络合物形成。最后一步,探索了两个较大的二十面体硼烷笼与苯的相互作用。单价阴离子 CB(11)H(12)(-)的络合物具有两个最小值:第一个堆叠在苯环平面上方,具有 C-H···π 氢键,第二个平面,其中碳硼烷笼通过五个 B-H···H-C 二氢键与苯结合。DFT-SAPT/CBS 计算表明,这两种结合模式都通过色散作用随后是静电项稳定,平面络合物比堆叠络合物稳定 1.4 kcal·mol(-1)。二价阴离子 B(12)H(12)(2-)仅在平面几何形状下与苯相互作用,与较小的阴离子相似。11.0 kcal·mol(-1)的大稳定能由主要的吸引色散和稍小的静电和诱导项组成。总之,硼烷/碳硼烷···芳环相互作用在络合物的几何形状和稳定能组成方面都有所不同。从高级量子化学计算中得出的详细见解可以帮助我们理解主体-客体络合或碳硼烷···生物分子相互作用等重要过程。