比较效果研究的视角：来自不同群体的观点。 - Suppr

Perspectives on comparative effectiveness research: views from diverse constituencies.

作者信息

Nellesen Dave, Birnbaum Howard G, Greenberg Paul E

出版信息

Pharmacoeconomics. 2010;28(10):789-98. doi: 10.2165/11535790-000000000-00000.

DOI:10.2165/11535790-000000000-00000

PMID:20831287

Abstract

摘要

相似文献

Perspectives on comparative effectiveness research: views from diverse constituencies.

Pharmacoeconomics. 2010;28(10):789-98. doi: 10.2165/11535790-000000000-00000.

Introducing perspectives on comparative effectiveness research.

Pharmacoeconomics. 2010;28(10):787-8. doi: 10.2165/11535820-000000000-00000.

Perspective and desire in comparative effectiveness research: the relative unimportance of mere preferences, the central importance of context.

Pharmacoeconomics. 2010;28(10):889-97. doi: 10.2165/11535270-000000000-00000.

Relative effectiveness and the European pharmaceutical market.

Eur J Health Econ. 2011 Apr;12(2):97-102. doi: 10.1007/s10198-011-0297-z.

Investigation of comparative effectiveness research in Asia, Europe, and North America.

Indian J Pharmacol. 2015 Nov-Dec;47(6):585-93. doi: 10.4103/0253-7613.169592.

Universal health coverage--big thinking versus big data.

Value Health. 2013 Jan-Feb;16(1 Suppl):S1-3. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2012.10.016. Epub 2012 Nov 22.

US can draw insight from other nations' experiences with evidence-based medicine.

JAMA. 2012 Apr 18;307(15):1567-9. doi: 10.1001/jama.2012.457.

What outcomes should US policy makers compare in comparative effectiveness research?

Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res. 2010 Jun;10(3):217-20. doi: 10.1586/erp.10.31.

[Cost-effectiveness of new drugs impacts reimbursement decision making but room for improvement].

Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd. 2010;154:A958.

Interview: a 20-year 'search for evidence' leads to the Center for Medical Technology Policy.

J Comp Eff Res. 2014 Jan;3(1):11-6. doi: 10.2217/cer.13.88.

引用本文的文献

PAYER PERSPECTIVES ON FUTURE ACCEPTABILITY OF COMPARATIVE EFFECTIVENESS AND RELATIVE EFFECTIVENESS RESEARCH.

Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2015 Jan;31(1-2):90-8. doi: 10.1017/S0266462315000203.

Physician Perspectives on Comparative Effectiveness Research: Implications for Practice-based Evidence.

Glob Adv Health Med. 2012 Sep;1(4):32-6. doi: 10.7453/gahmj.2012.1.4.004.

Personalized medicine and comparative effectiveness research in an era of fixed budgets.

EPMA J. 2010 Dec;1(4):633-40. doi: 10.1007/s13167-010-0058-6. Epub 2010 Dec 8.

Engaging with economic evaluation methods: insights from small and medium enterprises in the UK medical devices industry after training workshops.

Health Res Policy Syst. 2012 Sep 3;10:29. doi: 10.1186/1478-4505-10-29.

本文引用的文献

Generating evidence for comparative effectiveness research using more pragmatic randomized controlled trials.

Pharmacoeconomics. 2010;28(10):969-76. doi: 10.2165/11536160-000000000-00000.

No head-to-head trial? simulate the missing arms.

Pharmacoeconomics. 2010;28(10):957-67. doi: 10.2165/11537420-000000000-00000.

There's a reason they call them dummy variables: a note on the use of structural equation techniques in comparative effectiveness research.

Pharmacoeconomics. 2010;28(10):947-55. doi: 10.2165/11537750-000000000-00000.

Comparative effectiveness without head-to-head trials: a method for matching-adjusted indirect comparisons applied to psoriasis treatment with adalimumab or etanercept.

Pharmacoeconomics. 2010;28(10):935-45. doi: 10.2165/11538370-000000000-00000.

Managed care pharmacy sees potential of comparative effectiveness research to improve patient care and lower costs.

Pharmacoeconomics. 2010;28(10):931-4. doi: 10.2165/11535610-000000000-00000.

Comparative effectiveness, personalized medicine and innovation: the path forward.

Pharmacoeconomics. 2010;28(10):923-30. doi: 10.2165/11539030-000000000-0000010.2165/11537370-000000000-00000.

Comparative effectiveness research: the view from a pharmaceutical company.

Pharmacoeconomics. 2010;28(10):915-22. doi: 10.2165/11535400-000000000-00000.

Comparative effectiveness research and personalized medicine: catalyzing or colliding?

Pharmacoeconomics. 2010;28(10):905-13. doi: 10.2165/11535830-000000000-00000.

Comparative effectiveness research and the psychology of medical practice: the vicissitudes of knowledge implementation.

Pharmacoeconomics. 2010;28(10):899-903. doi: 10.2165/11535620-000000000-00000.

Perspective and desire in comparative effectiveness research: the relative unimportance of mere preferences, the central importance of context.

Pharmacoeconomics. 2010;28(10):889-97. doi: 10.2165/11535270-000000000-00000.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述，助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型，支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验

Perspectives on comparative effectiveness research: views from diverse constituencies.

作者信息

出版信息

相似文献

引用本文的文献

本文引用的文献

文献AI研究员

用中文搜PubMed

文档翻译

Suppr 超能文献

相似文献

引用本文的文献

本文引用的文献