• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

噪声暴露、特征描述和三个足球场的比较。

Noise exposure, characterization, and comparison of three football stadiums.

机构信息

Department of Environmental and Radiological Health Sciences, Colorado State University, Ft. Collins, Colorado, USA.

出版信息

J Occup Environ Hyg. 2010 Nov;7(11):616-21. doi: 10.1080/15459624.2010.510107.

DOI:10.1080/15459624.2010.510107
PMID:20835945
Abstract

Personal noise exposure samples were collected from five workers at a large-sized college football stadium and five workers at a medium-sized college football stadium in northern Colorado during three home football games, for a total of 30 personal noise exposures. In addition, personal noise exposure samples were collected from five fans at a National Football League (NFL) stadium, and from two fans at each of the college stadiums during three home football games, for a total of 27 personal noise exposure samples. None of the workers' noise doses were above the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) permissible exposure limit of 90 dBA. However, 11 of 28 (39%) workers' noise doses exceeded the OSHA action level of 85 dBA that would require enrollment in a hearing conservation program. Following ACGIH® recommendations for noise exposure limits, 27 of 28 (96%) workers would be considered overexposed. In addition, 24 of 25 fans (96%) were also overexposed according to ACGIH and World Health Organization recommendations. At the 95% confidence level, workers' and fans' noise exposures were not significantly different between the three stadiums. However, there was significant noise level variability between the games in each individual stadium (e.g., 82 dbA vs. 87 dbA mean worker OSHA noise exposure for two games at the large-sized college stadium, p=0.001). Given the personal sampling results for the stadium workers, the investigators believe that stadium management at these two universities should implement a hearing conservation program and provide hearing protection. Management should include a warning of possible loud-noise exposure during any sporting events held at the stadiums in fan guides, pamphlets, websites, or other appropriate communication tools. This information should include the health effects of loud noise exposure, namely, noise-induced hearing loss, the information should also be specifically targeted to parents of young children, including a strong recommendation that hearing protection be worn by all children during the sporting event.

摘要

从科罗拉多州北部的一个大型大学橄榄球场和一个中型大学橄榄球场的五名工人以及五个 NFL 体育场的球迷,以及三个主场橄榄球赛期间每个大学体育场的两名球迷处采集了个人噪声暴露样本,共采集了 30 份个人噪声暴露样本。 没有工人的噪声剂量超过职业安全与健康管理局(OSHA)允许的 90 dBA 暴露限值。 但是,28 名工人中有 11 名(39%)的噪声剂量超过了要求参加听力保护计划的 OSHA 行动水平 85 dBA。 根据 ACGIH®噪声暴露限值建议,28 名工人中有 27 名(96%)被认为暴露过度。 此外,根据 ACGIH 和世界卫生组织的建议,25 名球迷中有 24 名(96%)也被认为暴露过度。 在 95%置信水平下,三个体育场的工人和球迷的噪声暴露没有显着差异。 但是,每个体育场的比赛之间噪声水平变化很大(例如,大型大学体育场的两场比赛中工人的 OSHA 噪声暴露平均值为 82 dB,而 87 dB,p = 0.001)。 鉴于体育场工人的个人抽样结果,调查人员认为这两所大学的体育场管理人员应实施听力保护计划并提供听力保护。 管理应包括在球迷指南、小册子、网站或其他适当的沟通工具中警告在体育场举行的任何体育赛事中可能会出现大声噪声。 该信息应包括大声噪声暴露的健康影响,即噪声性听力损失,信息也应专门针对幼儿的父母,包括强烈建议所有儿童在体育赛事中佩戴听力保护器。

相似文献

1
Noise exposure, characterization, and comparison of three football stadiums.噪声暴露、特征描述和三个足球场的比较。
J Occup Environ Hyg. 2010 Nov;7(11):616-21. doi: 10.1080/15459624.2010.510107.
2
Occupational and recreational noise exposure from indoor arena hockey games.室内曲棍球比赛中的职业和娱乐性噪声暴露。
J Occup Environ Hyg. 2013;10(1):11-6. doi: 10.1080/15459624.2012.736341.
3
An assessment of occupational noise exposures in four construction trades.对四个建筑行业的职业噪声暴露情况的评估。
Am Ind Hyg Assoc J. 1999 Nov-Dec;60(6):807-17. doi: 10.1080/00028899908984506.
4
Occupational exposures to noise resulting from the workplace use of personal media players at a manufacturing facility.由于在制造工厂使用个人媒体播放器而导致的职业性噪声暴露。
J Occup Environ Hyg. 2012;9(10):592-601. doi: 10.1080/15459624.2012.713768.
5
Unsafe and violent behavior in commercials aired during televised major sporting events.在电视转播的重大体育赛事期间播出的商业广告中的不安全和暴力行为。
Pediatrics. 2004 Dec;114(6):e694-8. doi: 10.1542/peds.2004-0105.
6
Occupational noise exposures among three farm families in northwest Ohio.俄亥俄州西北部三个农场家庭的职业性噪声暴露情况。
J Agromedicine. 2008;13(3):165-74. doi: 10.1080/10599240802406049.
7
The effectiveness of hearing protection among construction workers.建筑工人听力保护的有效性。
J Occup Environ Hyg. 2005 Apr;2(4):227-38. doi: 10.1080/15459620590932154.
8
Noise exposures of rail workers at a North American chemical facility.北美一家化学工厂铁路工人的噪声暴露情况。
Am J Ind Med. 2005 Apr;47(4):364-9. doi: 10.1002/ajim.20152.
9
Occupational Noise Exposure of Employees at Locally-Owned Restaurants in a College Town.大学城本地餐馆员工的职业噪声暴露情况
J Occup Environ Hyg. 2015;12(7):489-99. doi: 10.1080/15459624.2015.1018517.
10
Exposure assessment in auto collision repair shops.汽车碰撞维修店中的暴露评估。
J Occup Environ Hyg. 2011 Jul;8(7):401-8. doi: 10.1080/15459624.2011.585117.

引用本文的文献

1
University Marching Band Members' Noise Dosages and Hearing Health-Related Knowledge.大学生军乐队成员的噪声剂量与听力健康相关知识。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Nov 1;18(21):11497. doi: 10.3390/ijerph182111497.
2
Loud Music and Leisure Noise Is a Common Cause of Chronic Hearing Loss, Tinnitus and Hyperacusis.嘈杂的音乐和休闲噪音是慢性听力损失、耳鸣和听觉过敏的常见原因。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Apr 16;18(8):4236. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18084236.
3
Attitudes toward noise, perceived hearing symptoms, and reported use of hearing protection among college students: Influence of youth culture.
大学生对噪音的态度、感知到的听力症状以及报告的听力保护使用情况:青年文化的影响。
Noise Health. 2015 Nov-Dec;17(79):394-405. doi: 10.4103/1463-1741.169701.
4
Impulse noise: can hitting a softball harm your hearing?脉冲噪声:击打垒球会损害听力吗?
ScientificWorldJournal. 2014 Mar 20;2014:702723. doi: 10.1155/2014/702723. eCollection 2014.
5
Real-ear acoustical characteristics of impulse sound generated by golf drivers and the estimated risk to hearing: a cross-sectional study.高尔夫球杆产生的脉冲声的真耳声学特性及听力估计风险:一项横断面研究。
BMJ Open. 2014 Jan 21;4(1):e003517. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2013-003517.
6
Extended high-frequency thresholds in college students: effects of music player use and other recreational noise.大学生的扩展高频听力阈值:使用音乐播放器及其他娱乐噪音的影响。
J Am Acad Audiol. 2013 Sep;24(8):725-39. doi: 10.3766/jaaa.24.8.9.