• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Hancock II 与 Perimount 主动脉生物瓣的长期临床和血液动力学性能。

Long-term clinical and hemodynamic performance of the Hancock II versus the Perimount aortic bioprostheses.

机构信息

Division of Cardiac Surgery, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.

出版信息

Circulation. 2010 Sep 14;122(11 Suppl):S10-6. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.109.928085.

DOI:10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.109.928085
PMID:20837899
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The Medtronic Hancock II and the Carpentier-Edwards Perimount are among the world's most commonly used aortic bioprostheses. However, a direct comparison of their clinical performance is lacking. To minimize biases inherent to between-center comparisons, we examined these prostheses within a large, contemporary, single-center cohort.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Between 1990 and 2007, 1659 patients (mean age, 73.1±9.3 years) underwent aortic valve replacement with either the Hancock II (N=1021) or the Perimount (N=638). Patients were prospectively followed-up with serial clinic visits and echocardiograms for up to 16 years (mean, 5.0±3.3 years). There was no significant difference in aortic root size preoperatively (P=0.7). Aortic root enlargement was more commonly performed with the Perimount (P<0.001), and the manufacturer valve size of the implanted prosthesis was larger with the Hancock II (P<0.001). Postoperatively, peak and mean transprosthesis gradients were higher for the Hancock II (32.7±0.7 and 16.0±0.3 mm Hg, respectively) than for the Perimount (24.9±0.7 and 13.4±0.4 mm Hg, respectively; P<0.001). However, no difference in left ventricular mass regression was observed at late follow-up (P=0.9). Unadjusted 10-year survival was 59.4%±2.4% for the Hancock II and 70.2%±3.8% for the Perimount (P=0.07). Multivariable predictors of survival did not include prosthesis type (P=0.2).

CONCLUSIONS

For the same manufacturer valve size, the Perimount is larger, which may warrant enlarging the aortic root more often, and it is associated with better hemodynamics than the Hancock II. These differences do not impact survival or left ventricular mass regression, and the long-term clinical performances of the Hancock II and Perimount bioprostheses are equivalent.

摘要

背景

美敦力 Hancock II 和爱德华兹 Carpentier-Edwards Perimount 是世界上使用最广泛的两种主动脉生物瓣。然而,缺乏对它们临床性能的直接比较。为了将中心间比较固有的偏倚降到最低,我们在一个大型的、当代的、单中心队列中检查了这些假体。

方法和结果

1990 年至 2007 年间,1659 例患者(平均年龄 73.1±9.3 岁)接受了主动脉瓣置换术,其中 Hancock II 组 1021 例,Perimount 组 638 例。前瞻性随访时间为 16 年(平均 5.0±3.3 年),随访内容包括定期门诊就诊和超声心动图检查。术前主动脉根部大小无显著差异(P=0.7)。Perimount 组更常进行主动脉根部扩张(P<0.001),且 Hancock II 组植入的假体制造商尺寸更大(P<0.001)。术后,Hancock II 组的跨瓣峰值和平均压差分别为 32.7±0.7 和 16.0±0.3mmHg,高于 Perimount 组的 24.9±0.7 和 13.4±0.4mmHg(P<0.001)。然而,在晚期随访时未观察到左心室质量回归的差异(P=0.9)。未调整的 10 年生存率 Hancock II 组为 59.4%±2.4%,Perimount 组为 70.2%±3.8%(P=0.07)。生存的多变量预测因素不包括假体类型(P=0.2)。

结论

对于相同制造商的瓣膜尺寸,Perimount 更大,这可能需要更频繁地扩大主动脉根部,并且与 Hancock II 相比具有更好的血液动力学性能。这些差异不会影响生存或左心室质量回归,并且 Hancock II 和 Perimount 生物瓣的长期临床性能相当。

相似文献

1
Long-term clinical and hemodynamic performance of the Hancock II versus the Perimount aortic bioprostheses. Hancock II 与 Perimount 主动脉生物瓣的长期临床和血液动力学性能。
Circulation. 2010 Sep 14;122(11 Suppl):S10-6. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.109.928085.
2
Carpentier-Edwards Perimount Magna valve versus Medtronic Hancock II: a matched hemodynamic comparison.卡朋蒂埃-爱德华兹卓越 Magna 瓣膜与美敦力汉考克 II 型瓣膜:配对血流动力学比较
Ann Thorac Surg. 2007 Jun;83(6):2054-8. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2007.02.062.
3
Influence of completely supra-annular placement of bioprostheses on exercise hemodynamics in patients with a small aortic annulus.生物假体完全置于主动脉瓣环上方对小主动脉瓣环患者运动血流动力学的影响。
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2007 May;133(5):1234-41. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2006.10.074.
4
Performance of the Carpentier-Edwards SAV and Hancock-II porcine bioprostheses in aortic valve replacement.Carpentier-Edwards SAV和Hancock-II猪生物瓣膜在主动脉瓣置换术中的性能。
J Heart Valve Dis. 2002 May;11(3):424-30.
5
Hemodynamic evaluation of 23 mm Pericarbon and 23 mm Hancock II bioprostheses in the aortic position at mid-term follow up.
J Heart Valve Dis. 1996 Nov;5(6):656-61.
6
The effective orifice area/patient aortic annulus area ratio: a better way to compare different bioprostheses? A prospective randomized comparison of the Mosaic and Perimount bioprostheses in the aortic position.有效瓣口面积与患者主动脉瓣环面积之比:比较不同生物瓣膜的更好方法?主动脉位置的Mosaic和Perimount生物瓣膜的前瞻性随机对照研究。
J Heart Valve Dis. 2004 May;13(3):382-8; discussion 388-9.
7
Stentless aortic valves are hemodynamically superior to stented valves during mid-term follow-up: a large retrospective study.无支架主动脉瓣在中期随访期间血流动力学上优于有支架瓣膜:一项大型回顾性研究。
Ann Thorac Surg. 2005 Dec;80(6):2180-5. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2005.05.055.
8
Stentless aortic valve replacement with the biocor prosthesis: indications and outcome.使用生物心脏瓣膜假体进行无支架主动脉瓣置换术:适应症与结果
J Heart Valve Dis. 1996 Nov;5 Suppl 3:S314-6.
9
Carpentier-Edwards PERIMOUNT Magna bioprosthesis: a stented valve with stentless performance?卡朋蒂埃-爱德华兹PERIMOUNT Magna生物假体:一种具有无支架性能的带支架瓣膜?
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2005 Dec;130(6):1668-74. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2005.07.011. Epub 2005 Oct 26.
10
Clinical results of Hancock II versus Hancock Standard at long-term follow-up.
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2006 Sep;132(3):595-601, 601.e1-2. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2006.03.062.

引用本文的文献

1
Hemodynamic performance and midterm clinical outcomes after surgical aortic valve replacement using trifecta and perimount magna valves: a Japanese single-center experience.使用Trifecta和Perimount Magna瓣膜进行主动脉瓣置换术后的血流动力学性能和中期临床结果:日本单中心经验
J Cardiothorac Surg. 2025 Aug 8;20(1):326. doi: 10.1186/s13019-025-03565-w.
2
In vitro model assesses the susceptibility of polymeric scaffolds for material-driven heart valve regeneration to calcification.体外模型评估了用于材料驱动心脏瓣膜再生的聚合物支架对钙化的敏感性。
In Vitro Model. 2025 Jul 15;4(2):157-175. doi: 10.1007/s44164-025-00090-x. eCollection 2025 Aug.
3
Perceval valve intermediate outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis at 5-year follow-up.
佩尔塞瓦尔瓣膜中期结果:5 年随访的系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Cardiothorac Surg. 2023 Apr 11;18(1):129. doi: 10.1186/s13019-023-02273-7.
4
Flow dynamics of surgical and transcatheter aortic valves: Past to present.外科主动脉瓣和经导管主动脉瓣的血流动力学:从过去到现在。
JTCVS Open. 2022 Jan 24;9:43-56. doi: 10.1016/j.xjon.2022.01.017. eCollection 2022 Mar.
5
Glutaraldehyde and 2,3-butanediol treatment of bovine pericardium for aortic valve bioprosthesis in sheep: a preliminary study.戊二醛和2,3-丁二醇处理羊主动脉瓣生物假体用牛心包:一项初步研究。
Ann Transl Med. 2020 Dec;8(24):1668. doi: 10.21037/atm-20-7803.
6
[Safety of biological valves for aortic valve replacement: A systematic review and meta-analysis].[主动脉瓣置换生物瓣膜的安全性:系统评价与荟萃分析]
Beijing Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban. 2020 Jun 18;52(3):547-556. doi: 10.19723/j.issn.1671-167X.2020.03.023.
7
Indications for echocardiography of replacement heart valves: a joint statement from the British Heart Valve Society and British Society of Echocardiography.置换心脏瓣膜的超声心动图检查指征:英国心脏瓣膜学会和英国超声心动图学会联合声明
Echo Res Pract. 2019 Mar 1;6(1):G9-G15. doi: 10.1530/ERP-18-0079.
8
Mid- to long-term outcome comparison of the Medtronic Hancock II and bi-leaflet mechanical aortic valve replacement in patients younger than 60 years of age: a propensity-matched analysis.美敦力汉考克二代与双叶机械主动脉瓣置换术在60岁以下患者中的中长期疗效比较:倾向匹配分析
Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2016 Mar;22(3):280-6. doi: 10.1093/icvts/ivv347. Epub 2015 Dec 15.
9
Mid- to Long-term Clinical Outcomes of Hancock II Bioprosthesis in Chinese Population.汉考克二代生物假体在中国人群中的中长期临床结果
Chin Med J (Engl). 2015 Dec 20;128(24):3317-23. doi: 10.4103/0366-6999.171424.
10
Exercise Hemodynamics and Quality of Life after Aortic Valve Replacement for Aortic Stenosis in the Elderly Using the Hancock II Bioprosthesis.老年患者主动脉瓣狭窄行 Hancock II 生物瓣置换术后的运动血液动力学和生活质量。
Cardiol Res Pract. 2014;2014:151282. doi: 10.1155/2014/151282. Epub 2014 Dec 2.