School of Nursing, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, Canada.
Nurs Philos. 2010 Oct;11(4):250-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1466-769X.2010.00452.x.
According to our previous research, the use of glory holes in public venues such as saunas and bathhouses is very popular. The popularity of glory holes is due in part to the anonymous sex that these architectural elements allow. This post-structuralist theoretical reflection seeks to understand the specific nature of anonymous public sex among bathhouse patrons, focusing on the links between desire-architecture-place-sexual practices. Drawing on interviews with glory hole users gathered during an ethnographic research project in bathhouses, this essay goes beyond traditional public health discourse to offer an original perspective on anonymous public sex. Utilizing the philosophy of Deleuze and Guattari's concepts of assemblages and machines, we re-theorize glory hole sex--what we call 'faceless sex'--and rethink the ways that desire is imbricated with our understanding of architecture, place, and public. Finally, we reflect upon the particular ethical challenges that are posed by these particular sexual practices, and ask whether a post-structuralist ethic might be possible.
根据我们之前的研究,在桑拿房和浴室等公共场所使用“ glory holes ”(窥视孔)非常流行。这些建筑元素允许进行匿名性行为,这在一定程度上促成了“ glory holes ”的流行。本文从后结构主义理论出发,旨在理解浴室顾客中匿名公共性行为的具体性质,重点关注欲望-建筑-地点-性实践之间的联系。本文通过对在浴室进行人种学研究项目中收集的“ glory holes ”使用者的访谈,超越了传统公共卫生话语,为匿名公共性行为提供了一个新的视角。本文运用德勒兹和瓜塔里的集合和机器的哲学概念,重新理论化“ glory holes ”性——我们称之为“无脸性”——并重新思考欲望与我们对建筑、地点和公共性的理解交织在一起的方式。最后,我们反思了这些特殊的性行为带来的特殊伦理挑战,并探讨后结构主义伦理是否可能。