• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Comparison of endodontic file tip quality.

作者信息

Keate K C, Wong M

机构信息

U.S. Army Dental Activity, Fort Hood, TX.

出版信息

J Endod. 1990 Oct;16(10):486-91. doi: 10.1016/s0099-2399(07)80178-6.

DOI:10.1016/s0099-2399(07)80178-6
PMID:2084202
Abstract

Tip angulation and four visual characteristics denoting manufacturing quality of endodontic files were studied. One-hundred eighty K-type, Hedstrom, and Flex-type files from two manufacturers (Kerr and Mallefer) were evaluated. Photomicrographs (x 115) were made of each file. Two evaluators examined the photomicrographs. Tip angulation was studied to determine if files were compliant with ANSI/ADA Specification Nos. 28 and 58. The four visual characteristics compared in the study were symmetry versus asymmetry, smooth versus irregular, tip configuration, and shoulder configuration. Statistical analysis was made using the chi-square method. Mallefer files appear to be more in conformity with specifications for tip angle and more meticulously manufactured than Kerr files. Kerr Hedstrom files appear to conform less often to tip angle specifications than Kerr K-type or K-Flex files. K-type and Flex-type file tips appear to be better manufactured than Hedstrom file tips. Certification status of a file manufacturer did not correlate with a higher level of compliance with tip angulation specifications or with a better machined file tip.

摘要

相似文献

1
Comparison of endodontic file tip quality.
J Endod. 1990 Oct;16(10):486-91. doi: 10.1016/s0099-2399(07)80178-6.
2
Cross-sectional configuration of endodontic files compared with manufacturers' design.与制造商设计相比的根管锉横截面形态
J Endod. 1995 Dec;21(12):599-602. doi: 10.1016/S0099-2399(06)81111-8.
3
Machining efficiency of endodontic K files and Hedstrom files.根管治疗用K锉和H锉的加工效率。
J Endod. 1990 Aug;16(8):375-82. doi: 10.1016/s0099-2399(06)81909-6.
4
Revised ANSI/ADA specifications No. 28 for root canal files and reamers, type K, and No. 58 for root canal files, type H (Hedstrom). Council on Dental Materials, Instruments, and Equipment.
J Am Dent Assoc. 1989 Feb;118(2):239-40.
5
Relationship between file size and stiffness of stainless steel instruments.
Endod Dent Traumatol. 1994 Dec;10(6):260-3. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-9657.1994.tb00081.x.
6
Machining efficiency of Flex-R, K-Flex, Trio-Cut, and S Files.Flex-R锉、K-Flex锉、Trio-Cut锉和S锉的加工效率。
J Endod. 1990 Dec;16(12):575-9. doi: 10.1016/s0099-2399(07)80200-7.
7
Comparison of six files to prepare simulated root canals. 1.用于制备模拟根管的六个锉的比较。1.
Int Endod J. 1992 Mar;25(2):57-66. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2591.1992.tb00738.x.
8
Application of Endodontic Files for the Extraction of Root Tips: A Biomechanical Investigation and Case Study.根管锉在根尖取出中的应用:一项生物力学研究及病例分析
J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2016 Dec;74(12):2345-2350. doi: 10.1016/j.joms.2016.08.035. Epub 2016 Aug 31.
9
Machining efficiency and wear resistance of nickel-titanium endodontic files.
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 1996 May;81(5):596-602. doi: 10.1016/s1079-2104(96)80055-2.
10
Topographic Features of Five K-file Brands in Iranian Market: A Scanning Electron Microscopic Study.伊朗市场上五个K锉品牌的形貌特征:一项扫描电子显微镜研究。
Iran Endod J. 2018 Winter;13(1):66-70. doi: 10.22037/iej.v12i3.16031.

引用本文的文献

1
Physical Properties of Five Brands of K-Files.五种品牌K型锉的物理性能
Iran Endod J. 2016 Spring;11(2):114-8. doi: 10.7508/iej.2016.02.008. Epub 2016 Mar 20.
2
A comparison of dimensional standard of several nickel-titanium rotary files.几种镍钛旋转锉尺寸标准的比较。
Restor Dent Endod. 2014 Feb;39(1):7-11. doi: 10.5395/rde.2014.39.1.7. Epub 2014 Jan 20.