Cardiovascular Division, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02114, USA.
N Engl J Med. 2010 Sep 16;363(12):1146-55. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1005109.
Non–placebo-controlled trials of erythropoiesis-stimulating agents (ESAs) comparing lower and higher hemoglobin targets in patients with chronic kidney disease indicate that targeting of a lower hemoglobin range may avoid ESA-associated risks. However, target-based strategies are confounded by each patient's individual hematopoietic response.
We assessed the relationship among the initial hemoglobin response to darbepoetin alfa after two weight-based doses, the hemoglobin level achieved after 4 weeks, the subsequent darbepoetin alfa dose, and outcomes in 1872 patients with chronic kidney disease and type 2 diabetes mellitus who were not receiving dialysis. We defined a poor initial response to darbepoetin alfa (which occurred in 471 patients) as the lowest quartile of percent change in hemoglobin level (<2%) after the first two standardized doses of the drug.
Patients who had a poor initial response to darbepoetin alfa had a lower average hemoglobin level at 12 weeks and during follow-up than did patients with a better hemoglobin response (a change in hemoglobin level ranging from 2 to 15% or more) (P<0.001 for both comparisons), despite receiving higher doses of darbepoetin alfa (median dose, 232 μg vs. 167 μg; P<0.001). Patients with a poor response, as compared with those with a better response, had higher rates of the composite cardiovascular end point (adjusted hazard ratio, 1.31; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.09 to 1.59) or death (adjusted hazard ratio, 1.41; 95% CI, 1.12 to 1.78).
A poor initial hematopoietic response to darbepoetin alfa was associated with an increased subsequent risk of death or cardiovascular events as doses were escalated to meet target hemoglobin levels. Although the mechanism of this differential effect is not known, these findings raise concern about current target-based strategies for treating anemia in patients with chronic kidney disease. (Funded by Amgen; ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00093015.)
比较慢性肾脏病患者中较低和较高血红蛋白目标的非安慰剂对照促红细胞生成刺激剂(ESA)试验表明,目标血红蛋白范围较低可能避免 ESA 相关风险。然而,基于目标的策略受到每个患者个体造血反应的影响。
我们评估了 1872 例未接受透析的慢性肾脏病和 2 型糖尿病患者接受两次基于体重的达贝泊汀-α后最初血红蛋白对达贝泊汀-α的反应、第 4 周时达到的血红蛋白水平、随后的达贝泊汀-α剂量与结局之间的关系。我们将达贝泊汀-α的初始反应较差(发生在 471 例患者中)定义为药物的前两次标准化剂量后血红蛋白水平变化的最低四分位数(<2%)。
与血红蛋白反应较好的患者相比(血红蛋白变化范围为 2%至 15%或更多),初始对达贝泊汀-α反应较差的患者在 12 周和随访期间的平均血红蛋白水平较低(两者比较均<0.001),尽管接受了更高剂量的达贝泊汀-α(中位数剂量,232μg 比 167μg;P<0.001)。与反应较好的患者相比,反应较差的患者复合心血管终点(校正风险比,1.31;95%置信区间[CI],1.09 至 1.59)或死亡(校正风险比,1.41;95%CI,1.12 至 1.78)的发生率更高。
达贝泊汀-α初始造血反应较差与剂量升高以达到目标血红蛋白水平时死亡或心血管事件风险增加相关。尽管这种差异作用的机制尚不清楚,但这些发现引起了对治疗慢性肾脏病患者贫血的当前基于目标策略的关注。(由 Amgen 资助;ClinicalTrials.gov 编号,NCT00093015)。