Departments of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA.
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2010 Sep 15;35(20):1876-9. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181ef5c36.
STUDY DESIGN.: Multicenter, prospective clinical series. OBJECTIVE.: To investigate the effect of preoperative bracing on postoperative outcome of posterior spine fusion with instrumentation for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA.: Bracing is the standard of care for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis between 25° and 45°, yet the efficacy of bracing is questionable. It is important to evaluate the effect of bracing on outcomes in the adolescent idiopathic scoliosis population. METHODS.: We reviewed the outcomes of 281 before surgery braced and 328 before surgery nonbraced patients who underwent posterior spine fusion with instrumentation for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis before operation and at 2 years after operation using the Scoliosis Research Society instrument (SRS-30) and the Spinal Appearance Questionnaire. RESULTS.: At 2 years after operation, nonbraced patients demonstrated a greater improvement in the SRS-30 Pain domain score (0.23 vs. 0.08, P < 0.001), more improvement in back pain at rest (26.7% vs. 20.5%, P = 0.0009), and more improvement in back pain in the past 6 months (42.4% vs. 32.6%, P = 0.039) compared to braced patients. Also at 2 years after operation, nonbraced patients reported higher SRS-30 Activity domain scores (4.38 vs. 4.32, P = 0.031), Satisfaction domain scores (4.53 vs. 4.42, P = 0.007), and Total scores (4.27 vs. 4.35, P = 0.036) compared with braced patients. The 2-year Spinal Appearance Questionnaire scores showed that nonbraced patients reported a greater "decrease in importance" than braced patients in having "more even shoulders" (79.4% vs. 70.5%, P = 0.03), "more even hips" (74.6% vs. 71.6%, P = 0.042), and "more even ribs in back" (78.4% vs. 69.5%, P = 0.05). CONCLUSION.: Before surgery braced patients have more pain, lower activity levels, lower satisfaction, and lower total SRS-30 scores at 2 years after operation. Braced patients also have more "spine-specific" appearance concerns compared to nonbraced patients. These results suggest a negative impact of preoperative bracing on outcomes after posterior spinal fusion for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. This "brace signature" should be taken into account when brace treatment is being considered.
多中心前瞻性临床系列研究。目的:研究术前支具对青少年特发性脊柱侧凸后路脊柱融合内固定术后结果的影响。背景资料总结:支具是青少年特发性脊柱侧凸 25°-45°之间的标准治疗方法,但支具的疗效存在争议。评估支具对青少年特发性脊柱侧凸患者的治疗效果非常重要。方法:我们回顾了 281 例术前支具治疗和 328 例术前非支具治疗的青少年特发性脊柱侧凸患者的手术结果,所有患者均接受后路脊柱融合内固定术,使用脊柱研究协会(SRS-30)和脊柱外观问卷(Spinal Appearance Questionnaire)分别在术前和术后 2 年进行评估。结果:术后 2 年,非支具组患者 SRS-30 疼痛评分(0.23 分 vs. 0.08 分,P < 0.001)、静息时背痛改善程度(26.7% vs. 20.5%,P = 0.0009)和过去 6 个月背痛改善程度(42.4% vs. 32.6%,P = 0.039)均明显优于支具组。术后 2 年,非支具组患者 SRS-30 活动评分(4.38 分 vs. 4.32 分,P = 0.031)、满意度评分(4.53 分 vs. 4.42 分,P = 0.007)和总分(4.27 分 vs. 4.35 分,P = 0.036)均明显高于支具组。术后 2 年脊柱外观问卷评分显示,非支具组患者认为“双肩更均匀”(79.4% vs. 70.5%,P = 0.03)、“臀部更均匀”(74.6% vs. 71.6%,P = 0.042)和“背部肋骨更均匀”(78.4% vs. 69.5%,P = 0.05)的重要性降低的比例均明显高于支具组。结论:术前支具治疗的患者术后 2 年疼痛更明显、活动水平更低、满意度更低、SRS-30 总分更低。与非支具组相比,支具组患者的“脊柱特异性”外观问题更为突出。这些结果提示术前支具对青少年特发性脊柱侧凸后路脊柱融合术的治疗效果有负面影响。在考虑支具治疗时,应该考虑这种“支具治疗效果”。