Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Rady Children's Hospital, San Diego, CA, USA.
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2009 Aug 15;34(18):E653-8. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181b2008f.
A retrospective review of scores from the Scoliosis Research Society outcomes instrument (SRS-24 questionnaire).
To quantify the isolated effects of spinal fusion and deformity magnitude on quality of life in patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS).
Significant improvements in 2-year postoperative SRS-24 questionnaire scores have been reported despite the loss of spinal motion due to instrumentation and arthrodesis. As deformity reduction may influence patient perception, it has been difficult to isolate the effect of spinal fusion on quality of life after scoliosis surgery.
SRS-24 scores were compared between 3 cohorts of AIS patients (preoperative, postoperative, and nonoperative) using an ANOVA (P < 0.05) to determine the isolated effects of spinal fusion and deformity magnitude. Preoperative SRS-24 scores were collected from a group of patients with preoperative major Cobb angles greater than 40 degrees (n = 194). Postoperative SRS-24 scores were collected from patients with preoperative major Cobb angles greater than 40 degrees and 2-year postoperative major Cobb angles between 20 degrees and 40 degrees (n = 196). Finally, SRS-24 scores were collected from a nonoperative group of patients with major Cobb angles between 20 degrees and 40 degrees (n = 112).
Spinal fusion was found to have a negative isolated effect on the Activity domain (-0.3) and on the Total score (-0.2) (P = 0.001) of the SRS-24 questionnaire (score range: 1-5). A smaller deformity magnitude, on the other hand, was found to have a significantly positive isolated effect on all 4 preoperative domains (P < 0.001) and on the Total score (P < 0.001). The combined effect of surgery (spinal fusion and deformity correction) was found to be significantly positive for the Total score (P < 0.001) and for the domains of Pain, Self-Image, and Function (P < 0.001).
Spinal fusion has an isolated negative effect on AIS patients' quality of life (Total score) mostly due to a decrease in scores of the Activity domain. The overall positive effect of surgery depends on the individual effects of spinal fusion (slight reduction in quality of life) and deformity reduction (modest improvement in quality of life).
回顾性分析脊柱侧凸研究学会结果工具(SRS-24 问卷)的评分。
量化脊柱融合和畸形程度对青少年特发性脊柱侧凸(AIS)患者生活质量的单独影响。
尽管由于器械和关节融合导致脊柱活动丧失,但术后 2 年 SRS-24 问卷评分显著改善。由于畸形减轻可能会影响患者的感知,因此很难单独确定脊柱融合对脊柱侧凸手术后生活质量的影响。
使用方差分析(P<0.05)比较 AIS 患者 3 个队列(术前、术后和非手术)的 SRS-24 评分,以确定脊柱融合和畸形程度的单独影响。术前 SRS-24 评分来自一组术前主 Cobb 角大于 40 度的患者(n=194)。术后 SRS-24 评分来自术前主 Cobb 角大于 40 度且术后 2 年主 Cobb 角在 20 度至 40 度之间的患者(n=196)。最后,从主 Cobb 角在 20 度至 40 度之间的非手术组患者中收集 SRS-24 评分(n=112)。
发现脊柱融合对 SRS-24 问卷的活动域(-0.3)和总分(-0.2)(P=0.001)有负面的单独影响(评分范围:1-5)。另一方面,较小的畸形程度对所有 4 个术前域(P<0.001)和总分(P<0.001)有显著的正单独影响。手术(脊柱融合和畸形矫正)的综合效应对总分(P<0.001)和疼痛、自我形象和功能域(P<0.001)有显著的正效应。
脊柱融合对 AIS 患者的生活质量(总分)有单独的负面影响,主要是由于活动域评分下降所致。手术的整体积极效果取决于脊柱融合(生活质量略有下降)和畸形减轻(生活质量适度改善)的个体影响。