Lapierre F, Masquelet A, Aesch B, Romana C
Service de Neurochirurgie, Hôpital La Miletrie, Poitiers.
Neurochirurgie. 1990;36(6):366-9.
The management of large defects after head injury, osteomyelitis or both is usually solved by the use of bone grafts, polymerised material or metallic prosthesis. The post-operative course is often frustrating when those materials are close to the frontal sinus leading to the removal of this material. For these reasons, we decided to use free periostic flaps for the management of these skull defects. The flap comes from the internal part of the femur creating no other defect in the body. Three patients with post infectious and post traumatic skull defects have been operated. The postoperative course was uneventful, the cosmetic result good and the protection of the cranial content effective after three months. Of these three patients one had eleven previous attempts of repair for his defect. This method seems to be a good one for those risky cases, and somewhat better than the use of great omentum transfer sometimes associated with bone grafts.
头部损伤、骨髓炎或两者兼有的大缺损的处理通常通过使用骨移植、聚合材料或金属假体来解决。当这些材料靠近额窦时,术后过程往往令人沮丧,导致这些材料被移除。出于这些原因,我们决定使用游离骨膜瓣来处理这些颅骨缺损。该皮瓣取自股骨内部,不会在身体上造成其他缺损。对三名感染后和创伤后颅骨缺损患者进行了手术。术后过程平稳,三个月后美容效果良好,对颅内容物的保护有效。在这三名患者中,有一名患者此前曾对其缺损进行过11次修复尝试。对于那些高风险病例,这种方法似乎是一种很好的方法,并且在某种程度上比有时与骨移植联合使用的大网膜转移要好。