Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Medisch Spectrum Twente Hospital Group, Enschede, The Netherlands.
J Eval Clin Pract. 2011 Apr;17(2):209-14. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2753.2010.01422.x. Epub 2010 Sep 16.
RATIONALE, AIMS AND OBJECTIVES: A national guideline was proposed to enable shared care in hearing complaints and therefore to change patient flows. In this study the effect of this guideline is evaluated.
From a total of 3500 patients with hearing complaints, consulting the Ear Nose and Throat Department of a large non-university hospital in the Netherlands in 2002, a random sample of 1000 patients was selected. Patient flow was simulated according to guideline criteria with as main outcome measures: the effect of the guideline on patient flow.
Simulation of the consensus guideline did not really alter patient flow, with 89% to 97% of the patients still being referred to the Ear Nose and Throat specialist or Audiological Centre. Age, ear operations in the past and asymmetric hearing loss are the most important factors determining whether a person is labelled as a patient in need of medical care.
The present study emphasizes the importance of designing evidence-based guidelines for shared care.
背景、目的和目标:提出了一项国家指南,以实现听力投诉的共同护理,从而改变患者的流动情况。本研究评估了该指南的效果。
从 2002 年荷兰一家大型非大学医院耳鼻喉科就诊的 3500 名听力投诉患者中,随机抽取了 1000 名患者。根据指南标准模拟患者流动情况,主要观察指标为:指南对患者流动的影响。
共识指南的模拟并没有真正改变患者的流动情况,89%至 97%的患者仍然被转诊到耳鼻喉科专家或听力中心。年龄、过去的耳部手术和听力不对称是决定一个人是否被标记为需要医疗护理的患者的最重要因素。
本研究强调了为共同护理制定基于证据的指南的重要性。