Suppr超能文献

西格列汀在单独使用 metformin 血糖控制不佳的 2 型糖尿病患者中不劣于格列吡嗪:一项 52 周随机对照试验。

Saxagliptin is non-inferior to glipizide in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus inadequately controlled on metformin alone: a 52-week randomised controlled trial.

机构信息

Hospital of the Ludwig Maximilian, University of Munich, Munich, Germany.

出版信息

Int J Clin Pract. 2010 Nov;64(12):1619-31. doi: 10.1111/j.1742-1241.2010.02510.x. Epub 2010 Sep 16.

Abstract

AIM

To assess the efficacy and safety of saxagliptin vs. glipizide as add-on therapy to metformin in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus and inadequate glycaemic control on metformin alone.

METHODS AND PATIENTS

A total of 858 patients [age ≥ 18 years; glycated haemoglobin (HbA(1c) ) > 6.5 - 10.0%; on stable metformin doses ≥ 1500 mg/day] were randomised 1 : 1 to saxagliptin 5 mg/day or glipizide up-titrated as needed from 5 to 20 mg/day for 52 weeks. The primary objective was to assess if the change from baseline HbA(1c) achieved with saxagliptin plus metformin was non-inferior to glipizide plus metformin.

RESULTS

The per-protocol analysis demonstrated non-inferiority of saxagliptin vs. glipizide; adjusted mean changes from baseline HbA(1c) were -0.74% vs. -0.80%, respectively; the between-group difference was 0.06% (95% CI, -0.05% to 0.16%). Treatment with saxagliptin vs. glipizide was associated with a significantly smaller proportion of patients with hypoglycaemic events (3.0% vs. 36.3%; p < 0.0001) and a divergent impact on body weight (adjusted mean change from baseline -1.1 kg with saxagliptin vs. 1.1 kg with glipizide; p < 0.0001). There was a significantly smaller rise in HbA(1c) (%/week) from week 24 to 52 with saxagliptin vs. glipizide (0.001% vs. 0.004%; p = 0.04) indicating a sustained glycaemic effect beyond week 24. Excluding hypoglycaemic events, the proportion of patients experiencing adverse events (AEs) was similar (60.0% saxagliptin vs. 56.7% glipizide); treatment-related AEs were less common with saxagliptin vs. glipizide (9.8% vs. 31.2%), attributable to the higher frequency of hypoglycaemia in glipizide patients. Discontinuation rates resulting from AEs were similar (∼4%).

CONCLUSION

Saxagliptin plus metformin was well tolerated, provided a sustained HbA(1c) reduction over 52 weeks, and was non-inferior to glipizide plus metformin, with reduced body weight and a significantly lower risk of hypoglycaemia.

摘要

目的

评估沙格列汀与格列吡嗪作为二甲双胍单药治疗血糖控制不佳的 2 型糖尿病患者的附加疗法的疗效和安全性。

方法和患者

共纳入 858 例患者(年龄≥18 岁;糖化血红蛋白(HbA1c)>6.5-10.0%;稳定服用二甲双胍剂量≥1500 mg/天),按 1:1 随机分组,分别接受沙格列汀 5 mg/天或格列吡嗪起始剂量 5 mg/天,按需滴定至 20 mg/天,治疗 52 周。主要终点为评估沙格列汀联合二甲双胍治疗组与格列吡嗪联合二甲双胍治疗组治疗后基线 HbA1c 的变化是否非劣效于后者。

结果

基于方案分析,沙格列汀与格列吡嗪相比具有非劣效性;两组 HbA1c 自基线的调整平均变化分别为-0.74%和-0.80%,组间差异为 0.06%(95%CI:-0.05%至 0.16%)。与格列吡嗪相比,沙格列汀治疗组低血糖事件的发生率显著较低(3.0% vs. 36.3%;p<0.0001),且对体重的影响也不同(沙格列汀治疗组体重自基线的调整平均变化为-1.1 kg,格列吡嗪组为 1.1 kg;p<0.0001)。从第 24 周到第 52 周,与格列吡嗪相比,沙格列汀治疗组 HbA1c (%/周)升高幅度显著较小(0.001% vs. 0.004%;p=0.04),提示其在第 24 周后具有持续的血糖控制作用。排除低血糖事件后,两组患者发生不良事件(AE)的比例相似(沙格列汀组 60.0% vs. 格列吡嗪组 56.7%);沙格列汀组治疗相关的 AE 发生率显著低于格列吡嗪组(9.8% vs. 31.2%),这归因于格列吡嗪组低血糖的发生率较高。因 AE 导致停药的比例也相似(约 4%)。

结论

沙格列汀联合二甲双胍耐受性良好,可在 52 周内持续降低 HbA1c,与格列吡嗪联合二甲双胍相比,沙格列汀具有降低体重和显著降低低血糖风险的优势。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验