• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

比较用于识别青光眼进展的功能和结构测量方法。

A comparison of functional and structural measures for identifying progression of glaucoma.

机构信息

Department of Psychology, Columbia University, New York, NY 10027, USA.

出版信息

Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2011 Jan 25;52(1):519-26. doi: 10.1167/iovs.10-5174. Print 2011 Jan.

DOI:10.1167/iovs.10-5174
PMID:20847115
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3053295/
Abstract

PURPOSE

To compare glaucoma progression by functional and structural tests.

METHODS

The authors prospectively studied 33 glaucoma patients (55 eyes); 20 eyes (15 patients) had disc hemorrhage, and 35 eyes (18 patients) had exfoliation glaucoma. The following tests were performed at two baseline and three follow-up examinations: frequency doubling perimetry (FDT), 24-2 Humphrey visual fields (HVF), multifocal visual evoked potentials (mfVEP), and optical coherence tomography (OCT). To identify progression, the baseline measurements were averaged and compared to those obtained at the final examination. Stereophotographs of the optic disc were obtained at baseline and compared with those at the final examination.

RESULTS

Patients were followed up for 21.1±1.8 months. For HVF there were significant changes in mean deviation (MD) in eight (14.5%) eyes but in pattern standard deviation (P/SD) in only two (3.6%) eyes. For FDT, there were significant changes in MD in 13 (23.6%) eyes. Five eyes showed changes in MD for HVF and FDT. For mfVEP, there was an increase in abnormal points in nine (16.4%) eyes. Six of these eyes did not show significant HVF or FDT changes. For OCT, RNFL average thickness values were significantly decreased in nine (16.4%) eyes. Nine (16.4%) eyes showed progression on stereophotography; four of these eyes did not show significant changes on OCT and functional tests.

CONCLUSIONS

Each test showed evidence of progression in some eyes. However, agreement among tests and stereophotography regarding which eyes showed progression was poor, illustrating the importance of following up patients with a combination of functional and structural tests.

摘要

目的

比较功能和结构测试对青光眼进展的影响。

方法

作者前瞻性研究了 33 例青光眼患者(55 只眼);20 只眼(15 例)有视盘出血,35 只眼(18 例)有剥脱性青光眼。在两次基线和三次随访检查中进行了以下测试:频率加倍视野计(FDT)、24-2 Humphrey 视野(HVF)、多焦视觉诱发电位(mfVEP)和光学相干断层扫描(OCT)。为了确定进展,将基线测量值平均并与最后一次检查获得的值进行比较。在基线和最后一次检查时获得视盘的立体照片并进行比较。

结果

患者随访 21.1±1.8 个月。HVF 的平均偏差(MD)在 8 只眼(14.5%)中发生显著变化,但在模式标准差(P/SD)中仅在 2 只眼(3.6%)中发生显著变化。FDT 的 MD 在 13 只眼(23.6%)中发生显著变化。5 只眼 HVF 和 FDT 的 MD 发生变化。mfVEP 中有 9 只眼(16.4%)异常点增加。其中 6 只眼 HVF 和 FDT 无显著变化。OCT 中,RNFL 平均厚度值在 9 只眼(16.4%)中显著降低。9 只眼(16.4%)的眼底照相显示进展;其中 4 只眼的 OCT 和功能测试无明显变化。

结论

每种测试在一些眼中都显示出进展的迹象。然而,测试和立体摄影在哪些眼中显示进展方面的一致性很差,这说明了用功能和结构测试相结合来随访患者的重要性。

相似文献

1
A comparison of functional and structural measures for identifying progression of glaucoma.比较用于识别青光眼进展的功能和结构测量方法。
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2011 Jan 25;52(1):519-26. doi: 10.1167/iovs.10-5174. Print 2011 Jan.
2
Correlation of frequency-doubling perimetry with retinal nerve fiber layer thickness and optic disc size in ocular hypertensives and glaucoma suspects.在高眼压症和青光眼疑似患者中,频域光相干断层扫描与视网膜神经纤维层厚度和视盘大小的相关性。
J Glaucoma. 2011 Aug;20(6):366-70. doi: 10.1097/IJG.0b013e3181eda96e.
3
Normal versus high tension glaucoma: a comparison of functional and structural defects.正常眼压性青光眼与高眼压性青光眼:功能和结构缺损的比较。
J Glaucoma. 2010 Mar;19(3):151-7. doi: 10.1097/IJG.0b013e318193c45c.
4
Identifying preperimetric functional loss in glaucoma: a blue-on-yellow multifocal visual evoked potentials study.青光眼视盘周围功能损害的识别:一项蓝黄相间多焦视觉诱发电位研究
Ophthalmology. 2009 Jun;116(6):1134-41. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2008.12.041. Epub 2009 Apr 23.
5
Detection of psychophysical and structural injury in eyes with glaucomatous optic neuropathy and normal standard automated perimetry.青光眼性视神经病变且标准自动视野计检查结果正常的眼睛中精神物理学和结构损伤的检测。
Arch Ophthalmol. 2006 Feb;124(2):169-76. doi: 10.1001/archopht.124.2.169.
6
Comparison of event-based analysis of glaucoma progression assessed subjectively on visual fields and retinal nerve fibre layer attenuation measured by optical coherence tomography.基于视野主观评估的青光眼进展事件分析与光学相干断层扫描测量的视网膜神经纤维层衰减的比较。
Int Ophthalmol. 2015 Feb;35(1):95-106. doi: 10.1007/s10792-014-0028-4. Epub 2014 Dec 13.
7
Humphrey matrix frequency doubling technology perimetry and optical coherence tomography measurement of the retinal nerve fiber layer thickness in both normal and ocular hypertensive subjects.在正常人和高眼压患者中,使用Humphrey矩阵频率加倍技术视野检查法和光学相干断层扫描测量视网膜神经纤维层厚度。
J Glaucoma. 2006 Aug;15(4):328-35. doi: 10.1097/01.ijg.0000212230.65545.d3.
8
Agreement among spectral-domain optical coherence tomography, standard automated perimetry, and stereophotography in the detection of glaucoma progression.光谱域光学相干断层扫描、标准自动视野计和立体摄影在青光眼进展检测中的一致性。
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2015 Jan 27;56(2):1253-60. doi: 10.1167/iovs.14-14994.
9
Comparing multifocal VEP and standard automated perimetry in high-risk ocular hypertension and early glaucoma.高危眼压升高和早期青光眼患者的多焦视觉诱发电位与标准自动视野计比较
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2007 Mar;48(3):1173-80. doi: 10.1167/iovs.06-0561.
10
Evaluation of the visual function in obstructive sleep apnea syndrome patients and normal-tension glaucoma by means of the multifocal visual evoked potentials.多焦视觉诱发电位评估阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停综合征患者和正常眼压性青光眼的视觉功能。
Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2012 Nov;250(11):1681-8. doi: 10.1007/s00417-012-1982-z. Epub 2012 Mar 14.

引用本文的文献

1
Frequency of Agreement Between Structural and Functional Glaucoma Testing: A Longitudinal Study of 3D OCT and Current Clinical Tests.结构与功能青光眼检测的一致性频率:3D OCT 和当前临床检测的纵向研究。
Am J Ophthalmol. 2024 Oct;266:196-205. doi: 10.1016/j.ajo.2024.05.018. Epub 2024 May 27.
2
Short-term Detection of Fast Progressors in Glaucoma: The Fast Progression Assessment through Clustered Evaluation (Fast-PACE) Study.青光眼快速进展者的短期检测:通过聚类评估进行快速进展评估(Fast-PACE)研究
Ophthalmology. 2024 Jun;131(6):645-657. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2023.12.031. Epub 2023 Dec 29.
3
Mean rate of progression of visual fields in patients with primary open-angle glaucoma and ocular hypertension attending a tertiary care center in South India - A prospective cohort study using FORUM Glaucoma Workplace software.印度南部一家三级护理中心原发性开角型青光眼和高眼压症患者的视野进展平均速率:使用 FORUM Glaucoma Workplace 软件的前瞻性队列研究。
Indian J Ophthalmol. 2023 Jul;71(7):2733-2738. doi: 10.4103/ijo.IJO_1989_22.
4
Cognitive Performance on the Montreal Cognitive Assessment Test and Retinal Structural and Functional Measures in Glaucoma.青光眼患者在蒙特利尔认知评估测试中的认知表现以及视网膜结构和功能指标
J Clin Med. 2022 Aug 30;11(17):5097. doi: 10.3390/jcm11175097.
5
A framework for assessing glaucoma progression using structural and functional indices jointly.联合使用结构和功能指标评估青光眼进展的框架。
PLoS One. 2020 Jul 1;15(7):e0235255. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0235255. eCollection 2020.
6
Review of Longitudinal Glaucoma Progression: 5 Years after the Shaffer Lecture.纵向青光眼进展综述:谢弗讲座 5 年后。
Ophthalmol Glaucoma. 2020 Mar-Apr;3(2):158-166. doi: 10.1016/j.ogla.2019.11.012. Epub 2019 Dec 2.
7
Hierarchical Cluster Analysis of Peripapillary Retinal Nerve Fiber Layer Damage and Macular Ganglion Cell Loss in Open Angle Glaucoma.青光眼患者视乳头周围视网膜神经纤维层损伤与黄斑神经节细胞丢失的层次聚类分析。
Korean J Ophthalmol. 2020 Feb;34(1):56-66. doi: 10.3341/kjo.2019.0112.
8
Evaluation of Visual Field and Imaging Outcomes for Glaucoma Clinical Trials (An American Ophthalomological Society Thesis).青光眼临床试验的视野和成像结果评估(美国眼科学会论文)
Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc. 2017 Aug 22;115:T4. eCollection 2017 Aug.
9
Multidimensional Functional and Structural Evaluation Reveals Neuroretinal Impairment in Early Diabetic Retinopathy.多维功能与结构评估揭示早期糖尿病视网膜病变中的神经视网膜损伤。
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2017 May 1;58(6):BIO277-BIO290. doi: 10.1167/iovs.17-21863.
10
Comparing glaucomatous disc change using stereo disc viewing and the MatchedFlicker programme in glaucoma experts and trainees.比较青光眼专家和学员使用立体视盘检查和匹配闪烁程序对视盘改变的评估。
Br J Ophthalmol. 2018 Mar;102(3):358-363. doi: 10.1136/bjophthalmol-2017-310336. Epub 2017 Aug 16.

本文引用的文献

1
Agreement among glaucoma specialists in assessing progressive disc changes from photographs in open-angle glaucoma patients.青光眼专家在评估开角型青光眼患者眼底照片中视盘渐进性变化方面的一致性。
Am J Ophthalmol. 2009 Jan;147(1):39-44.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.ajo.2008.07.023. Epub 2008 Sep 13.
2
Practical recommendations for measuring rates of visual field change in glaucoma.青光眼视野变化率测量的实用建议。
Br J Ophthalmol. 2008 Apr;92(4):569-73. doi: 10.1136/bjo.2007.135012. Epub 2008 Jan 22.
3
A framework for comparing structural and functional measures of glaucomatous damage.一种用于比较青光眼性损害的结构和功能测量指标的框架。
Prog Retin Eye Res. 2007 Nov;26(6):688-710. doi: 10.1016/j.preteyeres.2007.08.001. Epub 2007 Aug 21.
4
Predictors of long-term progression in the early manifest glaucoma trial.早期显性青光眼试验中长期进展的预测因素。
Ophthalmology. 2007 Nov;114(11):1965-72. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2007.03.016. Epub 2007 Jul 12.
5
Combining structural and functional testing for detection of glaucoma.结合结构和功能测试以检测青光眼。
Ophthalmology. 2006 Sep;113(9):1593-602. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2006.06.004.
6
Optic disc and visual field progression in ocular hypertensive subjects: detection rates, specificity, and agreement.高眼压受试者的视盘和视野进展:检测率、特异性及一致性
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2006 Jul;47(7):2904-10. doi: 10.1167/iovs.05-1584.
7
Longitudinal changes in the visual field and optic disc in glaucoma.青光眼患者视野及视盘的纵向变化
Prog Retin Eye Res. 2005 May;24(3):333-54. doi: 10.1016/j.preteyeres.2004.10.002. Epub 2005 Jan 24.
8
Normative ranges and specificity of the multifocal VEP.多焦视觉诱发电位的正常范围及特异性
Doc Ophthalmol. 2004 Jul;109(1):87-100. doi: 10.1007/s10633-004-3300-5.
9
Detecting early to mild glaucomatous damage: a comparison of the multifocal VEP and automated perimetry.检测早期至轻度青光眼性损害:多焦视觉诱发电位与自动视野计的比较
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2004 Feb;45(2):492-8. doi: 10.1167/iovs.03-0602.
10
Perimetric defects and ganglion cell damage: interpreting linear relations using a two-stage neural model.视野缺损与神经节细胞损伤:使用两阶段神经模型解释线性关系
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2004 Feb;45(2):466-72. doi: 10.1167/iovs.03-0374.