Department of Operative Dentistry and Periodontology, Ludwig Maximilians University Munich, Germany.
J Adhes Dent. 2010 Aug;12(4):259-72. doi: 10.3290/j.jad.a19262.
In 2007, new clinical criteria were approved by the FDI World Dental Federation and simultaneously published in three dental journals. The criteria were categorized into three groups: esthetic parameters (four criteria), functional parameters (six criteria), and biological parameters (six criteria). Each criterion can be expressed with five scores, three for acceptable and two for non-acceptable (one for reparable and one for replacement). The criteria have been used in several clinical studies since 2007, and the resulting experience in their application has led to a requirement to modify some of the criteria and scores. The two major alterations involve staining and approximal contacts. As staining of the margins and the surface have different causes, both phenomena do not appear simultaneously. Thus, staining has been differentiated into marginal staining and surface staining. The approximal contact now appears under the name "approximal anatomic form" as the approximal contour is a specific, often non-esthetic issue that cannot be integrated into the criterion "esthetic anatomical form". In 2008, a web-based training and calibration tool called e-calib (www.e-calib.info) was made available. Clinical investigators and other research workers can train and calibrate themselves interactively by assessing clinical cases of posterior restorations, which are presented as high quality pictures. Currently, about 300 clinical cases are included in the database which is regularly updated. Training for 8 of the 16 clinical criteria is available in the program: "Surface luster"; "Staining (surface, margins)"; "Color match and translucency"; "Esthetic anatomical form"; "Fracture of material and retention"; "Marginal adaptation"; "Recurrence of caries, erosion, abfraction"; and "Tooth integrity (enamel cracks, tooth fractures)". Typical clinical cases are presented for each of these eight criteria and their corresponding five scores.
2007 年,国际牙科联盟世界牙科联合会批准了新的临床标准,并同时在三种牙科期刊上发表。这些标准分为三组:美学参数(四项标准)、功能参数(六项标准)和生物学参数(六项标准)。每个标准都可以用五个分数来表示,三个表示可接受,两个表示不可接受(一个表示可修复,一个表示替换)。自 2007 年以来,这些标准已在多项临床研究中使用,在应用过程中获得的经验导致需要修改其中一些标准和分数。两个主要的改变涉及染色和邻面接触。由于边缘和表面的染色有不同的原因,这两种现象不会同时出现。因此,染色被分为边缘染色和表面染色。现在,邻面接触的名称为“邻面解剖形态”,因为邻面轮廓是一个特定的、常常是非美学的问题,不能纳入“美学解剖形态”标准。2008 年,开发了一个名为 e-calib(www.e-calib.info)的基于网络的培训和校准工具。临床研究人员和其他研究人员可以通过评估作为高质量图片呈现的后牙修复体的临床病例来进行交互式培训和校准。目前,数据库中大约有 300 个临床病例,数据库定期更新。该程序提供了 16 个临床标准中的 8 个标准的培训:“表面光泽度”;“染色(表面、边缘)”;“颜色匹配和半透明度”;“美学解剖形态”;“材料断裂和保留”;“边缘适应性”;“龋病、侵蚀、楔形缺损的复发”;和“牙齿完整性(釉质裂纹、牙齿折断)”。为这八个标准中的每一个标准及其相应的五个分数提供了典型的临床病例。