Suppr超能文献

分娩期的口服营养:“这究竟是谁的选择?”文献回顾。

Oral nutrition in labour: 'whose choice is it anyway?' A review of the literature.

机构信息

Women's & Children's Hospital, 72 King William Road, North Adelaide, 5006, South Australia, Australia.

出版信息

Midwifery. 2011 Oct;27(5):674-86. doi: 10.1016/j.midw.2010.05.006. Epub 2010 Sep 17.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

to identify factors affecting women's oral nutrition in labour.

DESIGN

literature review (1988-2009).

SETTING

Westernised maternity care settings.

PARTICIPANTS

women, midwives, obstetricians, anaesthetists and hospitals.

MEASUREMENTS AND FINDINGS

when addressing labour stages, the risk categorisation of women and maternal/fetal birthing outcomes, there was a lack of consistent evidence identifying adverse outcomes for mothers/infants when oral nutrition in labour had occurred.

KEY CONCLUSIONS

little evidence exists to support the continuance of restrictive practices around oral nutrition in labour for all women. Women's choice is impacted by health practitioners' opinions, experience and practice methods and policy (or lack thereof). Policies are not reflective of current evidence.

IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE

women's choices and desires regarding oral nutrition in labour need to be addressed. Clear guidelines/policies need to be established based on current evidence. Midwives need greater exposure to research, as well as involvement in policy development and implementation.

摘要

目的

确定影响分娩期妇女口腔营养的因素。

设计

文献回顾(1988-2009 年)。

设置

西化的产科护理环境。

参与者

妇女、助产士、产科医生、麻醉师和医院。

测量和发现

在处理分娩阶段、妇女和母婴分娩结局的风险分类时,当发生分娩期口腔营养时,没有一致的证据表明母亲/婴儿会出现不良后果。

主要结论

几乎没有证据支持继续对所有妇女在分娩期实行限制口腔营养的做法。妇女的选择受到卫生保健提供者的意见、经验和实践方法以及政策(或缺乏政策)的影响。政策没有反映当前的证据。

对实践的影响

需要解决妇女在分娩期对口腔营养的选择和愿望。需要根据现有证据制定明确的指南/政策。助产士需要更多地接触研究,并参与政策的制定和实施。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验