The U.S. Preventive Services Task Force guidelines are not supported by the scientific evidence.
作者信息
Kopans Daniel B
出版信息
Radiology. 2010 Oct;257(1):294-5; author reply 295. doi: 10.1148/radiol.100920.
PMID:20851947
Abstract
摘要
相似文献
1
The U.S. Preventive Services Task Force guidelines are not supported by the scientific evidence.
Radiology. 2010 Oct;257(1):294-5; author reply 295. doi: 10.1148/radiol.100920.
2
U.S. Preventive Services Task Force: the unbalanced view.
Radiology. 2010 Oct;257(1):297; author reply 297-8. doi: 10.1148/radiol.101148.
3
More mammography muddle: emotions, politics, science, costs, and polarization.
Radiology. 2010 May;255(2):311-6. doi: 10.1148/radiol.10100056.
4
Evidence-based advocacy rather than emotion in defense of screening mammography.
Radiology. 2010 Oct;257(1):295-6; author reply 296-7. doi: 10.1148/radiol.101109.
5
Wise words from Drs Berlin and Hall.
Radiology. 2010 Oct;257(1):298; author reply 298. doi: 10.1148/radio1.101252.
6
Whither scientific deliberation in health policy recommendations? Alice in the Wonderland of breast-cancer screening.
N Engl J Med. 1997 Apr 17;336(16):1180-3. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199704173361612.
7
Breast cancer: when and how often to get screened. How do you make sense of conflicting mammography guidelines?
Harv Womens Health Watch. 2013 Oct;21(2):3.
8
Image problems. Science, fear and the politics of mammograms.
Hosp Health Netw. 1997 Jun 5;71(11):36, 38.
9
The 2009 breast cancer screening recommendations of the US Preventive Services Task Force.
JAMA. 2010 Jan 13;303(2):162-3. doi: 10.1001/jama.2009.1989.
10
US Preventive Services Task Force recommendations for screening mammography: evidence-based medicine or the death of science?
J Am Coll Radiol. 2010 Jan;7(1):2-4. doi: 10.1016/j.jacr.2009.11.019.
Zotero 插件