相似文献
1
Evidence-based advocacy rather than emotion in defense of screening mammography.
Radiology. 2010 Oct;257(1):295-6; author reply 296-7. doi: 10.1148/radiol.101109.
2
U.S. Preventive Services Task Force: the unbalanced view.
Radiology. 2010 Oct;257(1):297; author reply 297-8. doi: 10.1148/radiol.101148.
3
More mammography muddle: emotions, politics, science, costs, and polarization.
Radiology. 2010 May;255(2):311-6. doi: 10.1148/radiol.10100056.
4
The U.S. Preventive Services Task Force guidelines are not supported by the scientific evidence.
Radiology. 2010 Oct;257(1):294-5; author reply 295. doi: 10.1148/radiol.100920.
5
Wise words from Drs Berlin and Hall.
Radiology. 2010 Oct;257(1):298; author reply 298. doi: 10.1148/radio1.101252.
6
Breast cancer screening: science, society and common sense.
Cancer Invest. 2010 Jan;28(1):1-6. doi: 10.3109/07357900903517001.
7
Breast cancer: when and how often to get screened. How do you make sense of conflicting mammography guidelines?
Harv Womens Health Watch. 2013 Oct;21(2):3.
8
Image problems. Science, fear and the politics of mammograms.
Hosp Health Netw. 1997 Jun 5;71(11):36, 38.
9
Whither scientific deliberation in health policy recommendations? Alice in the Wonderland of breast-cancer screening.
N Engl J Med. 1997 Apr 17;336(16):1180-3. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199704173361612.
10
The politics of mammography.
Radiol Clin North Am. 1992 Jan;30(1):235-41.
Zotero 插件