Suppr超能文献

抗抑郁药咯利普兰两种缓释制剂的体外和体内特性研究

In-vitro and in-vivo characterisation of two sustained release formulations for the antidepressant rolipram.

作者信息

Pfeffer M, Sauerbrey N, Windt-Hanke F, Krause W

机构信息

Schering Aktiengesellschaft, Department Pharmakokinetik, Berlin, Fed. Rep. of Germany.

出版信息

Arzneimittelforschung. 1990 Nov;40(11):1191-4.

PMID:2085329
Abstract

Using the pellet technology two sustained release formulations for (dl)-rolipram (ZK 62 711; CAS 61413-54-5) were developed and characterised by in-vitro dissolution tests and in a cross-over study in healthy male volunteers. In-vitro, 50% release was achieved within 2.5 h for formulation A and within 4 h for B. In-vivo, Cmax values of 4.4 +/- 0.9 ng/ml (A) and 2.1 +/- 0.8 ng/ml (B) were observed 2.8 +/- 0.8 h or 10.3 +/- 3.7 h after oral intake of 3 mg (dl)-rolipram. The terminal disposition half-life in the plasma was similar for both formulations (12 +/- 13 h and 11 +/- 2 h). Expectedly, the relative bioavailability of formulation B was lower compared to A (72%). Using the pellet technology, formulations with an intended release profile can be tailored to suit by mixing pellets with different release characteristics within one dosage form.

摘要

采用微丸技术开发了两种(消旋)咯利普兰(ZK 62 711;CAS 61413-54-5)的缓释制剂,并通过体外溶出试验和在健康男性志愿者中进行的交叉研究对其进行了表征。在体外,制剂A在2.5小时内实现了50%的释放,制剂B在4小时内实现了50%的释放。在体内,口服3毫克(消旋)咯利普兰后,在2.8±0.8小时或10.3±3.7小时观察到制剂A的Cmax值为4.4±0.9纳克/毫升,制剂B的Cmax值为2.1±0.8纳克/毫升。两种制剂在血浆中的末端消除半衰期相似(分别为12±13小时和11±2小时)。不出所料,制剂B相对于制剂A的相对生物利用度较低(72%)。采用微丸技术,可以通过在一种剂型中混合具有不同释放特性的微丸来定制具有预期释放曲线的制剂。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验