Division of Plastic, Reconstructive and Maxillofacial Surgery, the Department of Surgery, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD 21287, USA.
Microsurgery. 2010 Nov;30(8):593-602. doi: 10.1002/micr.20794.
Many studies demonstrate direct patient benefits from use of preoperative computed tomography angiograms (CTA) for abdominal tissue-based breast reconstruction. We present a novel classification schema to translate imaging results into further clinical relevance.
Each hemiabdomen CTA was classified into a schema that addressed findings of expected anatomy, anatomy that necessitates a change in operative technique and anatomy that suggests less morbid procedures may be considered.
Eighty-six patients (172 hemiabdomens) were available for study. Of the reconstructions performed in this time period, 40 (47%) were bilateral and 46 (53%) unilateral. Based on perforator size and location, relative perimuscular anatomy, and continuity of vessels, five categories were defined: type I "Traditional" anatomy (n = 150, 87%), type II "Highly Favorable" anatomy (n = 11, 6.4%), type III "Altered-Superiorly Translocated" anatomy (n = 9, 5.2%), type IV "Superficial Dominant" anatomy (n = 26, 15%), and type V "Hostile" anatomy (n = 4, 2.3%). The additive total is greater than 100%, because vessels may fall into more than one category.
In providing the microsurgeon with a preoperative vascular map that has the potential to influence the preoperative, operative, and postoperative course, abdominal CTAs should be considered a worthy adjunct to the diagnostic armamentarium of the reconstructive surgeon. These classifications and their clinical impacts become even more important in centers performing increasing numbers of bilateral reconstructions. We believe that our simple schema can facilitate effective use of this powerful tool, aiding in overall care of the breast reconstruction patient.
许多研究表明,术前计算机断层血管造影(CTA)可直接使腹部组织乳房重建的患者受益。我们提出了一种新的分类方案,将影像学结果转化为进一步的临床相关性。
对每个半腹部 CTA 进行分类,以确定预期解剖结构、需要改变手术技术的解剖结构以及提示可以考虑采用创伤较小的手术方法的解剖结构。
在这段时间内进行的重建中,有 40 例(47%)为双侧,46 例(53%)为单侧。根据穿支血管的大小和位置、相对肌内解剖结构以及血管的连续性,定义了五个类别:I 型“传统”解剖结构(n = 150,87%)、II 型“非常有利”解剖结构(n = 11,6.4%)、III 型“移位性上移”解剖结构(n = 9,5.2%)、IV 型“表浅优势”解剖结构(n = 26,15%)和 V 型“敌对”解剖结构(n = 4,2.3%)。由于血管可能属于多个类别,因此总和大于 100%。
为显微外科医生提供术前血管图,有可能影响术前、术中和术后过程,腹部 CTA 应被视为重建外科医生诊断工具的有价值的辅助手段。在进行越来越多的双侧重建的中心,这些分类及其临床影响变得更加重要。我们相信,我们的简单分类方案可以促进这种强大工具的有效使用,从而有助于乳房重建患者的整体护理。