• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

人群样本中显著的支气管扩张反应性和“可逆转性”。

Significant bronchodilator responsiveness and "reversibility" in a population sample.

机构信息

University of Kentucky, Lexington, 40536, USA.

出版信息

COPD. 2010 Oct;7(5):323-30. doi: 10.3109/15412555.2010.510161.

DOI:10.3109/15412555.2010.510161
PMID:20854046
Abstract

Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) is defined by being "not fully reversible", most guidelines recommend measurement of lung function after the administration of a bronchodilator. The objective of this study was to compare bronchodilator responsiveness (significant improvement in the FEV(1) or FVC) to full-, partial- or "inverse'" reversibility in obstruction status in a population-based sample in Southeastern Kentucky. The study population was selected using random digit dialing of an adult population in Southeastern Kentucky as part of the Burden of Lung disease (BOLD) project. Lung function was assessed using spirometry pre- and post-bronchodilation. Subjects presence and severity of COPD was classified using modified Global Obstructive Lung Disease (GOLD) criteria. We examined the relation between changes in "obstruction" status (based on the FEV(1)/ FVC of 0.7) and the presence of "significant bronchodilator responsiveness" (based on ≥ 12% improvement in the FEV(1) or the FVC). The final population with acceptable pre- and post-bronchodilator spirometry included 440 participants. 32/440 subjects (7.3%) changed from obstructed to unobstructed (full-reversibility), 19/440 (4.3%) changed from unobstructed to obstructed ("inverse"-reversibility), 389/440 (88.4%) had either no-change or partial-reversibility, and 65/440 (14.8%) had bronchodilator responsiveness. Among those with full-reversibility, only 9/32 (28.1%) had bronchodilator responsiveness, whereas among subjects with "inverse"-reversibility, 10/19 (52.6%) had bronchodilator responsiveness. Among all subjects with bronchodilator responsiveness, only 19/65 (29.2%) changed categories. Our findings suggest that significant bronchodilator responsiveness is not the same as "reversibility" of "obstruction", even though these terms are often used interchangeably.

摘要

慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)的定义为“不完全可逆”,大多数指南建议在给予支气管扩张剂后测量肺功能。本研究的目的是比较支气管扩张剂反应性(FEV1 或 FVC 显著改善)与东南肯塔基州基于人群样本中阻塞状态的完全、部分或“反向”可逆性。研究人群是通过东南肯塔基州成人人群的随机数字拨号选择的,作为肺部疾病负担(BOLD)项目的一部分。使用支气管扩张前后的肺活量测定法评估肺功能。使用改良全球阻塞性肺病(GOLD)标准对受试者的 COPD 存在和严重程度进行分类。我们检查了“阻塞”状态变化(基于 FEV1/FVC 为 0.7)与“显著支气管扩张剂反应性”(基于 FEV1 或 FVC 改善≥ 12%)之间的关系。最终纳入可接受的支气管扩张前后肺活量测定法的人群包括 440 名参与者。440 名受试者中有 32/440(7.3%)从阻塞性转变为非阻塞性(完全可逆),19/440(4.3%)从非阻塞性转变为阻塞性(“反向”可逆),389/440(88.4%)无变化或部分可逆,65/440(14.8%)有支气管扩张剂反应性。在完全可逆的患者中,仅有 32/32(9/32)(28.1%)有支气管扩张剂反应性,而在“反向”可逆的患者中,19/19(10/19)(52.6%)有支气管扩张剂反应性。在所有有支气管扩张剂反应性的患者中,仅有 65/65(19/65)(29.2%)改变了分类。我们的发现表明,显著的支气管扩张剂反应性与“阻塞”的“可逆性”并不相同,尽管这两个术语经常互换使用。

相似文献

1
Significant bronchodilator responsiveness and "reversibility" in a population sample.人群样本中显著的支气管扩张反应性和“可逆转性”。
COPD. 2010 Oct;7(5):323-30. doi: 10.3109/15412555.2010.510161.
2
[Comparison of lung volume response with airflow response to bronchodilator in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease].[慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者肺容积反应与支气管扩张剂气流反应的比较]
Zhonghua Jie He He Hu Xi Za Zhi. 2010 Feb;33(2):109-13.
3
The forgotten message from gold: FVC is a primary clinical outcome measure of bronchodilator reversibility in COPD.来自黄金标准的被遗忘的信息:用力肺活量(FVC)是慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)中支气管扩张剂可逆性的主要临床结局指标。
Pulm Pharmacol Ther. 2008 Oct;21(5):767-73. doi: 10.1016/j.pupt.2008.04.005. Epub 2008 May 6.
4
Impact of bronchodilator use on the prevalence of COPD in population-based samples.支气管扩张剂的使用对基于人群样本的慢性阻塞性肺疾病患病率的影响。
COPD. 2007 Jun;4(2):113-20. doi: 10.1080/15412550701341012.
5
[Bronchial obstruction reversibility test in the assessment of COPD severity--controversies].[支气管阻塞可逆性试验在慢性阻塞性肺疾病严重程度评估中的争议]
Pneumonol Alergol Pol. 2006;74(1):68-71.
6
The volumetric response to bronchodilators in stable chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.稳定期慢性阻塞性肺疾病对支气管扩张剂的容量反应
COPD. 2008 Jun;5(3):147-52. doi: 10.1080/15412550802092928.
7
The local prevalence of COPD by post-bronchodilator GOLD criteria in Korea.韩国根据支气管扩张剂后GOLD标准诊断的慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)的当地患病率。
Int J Tuberc Lung Dis. 2006 Dec;10(12):1393-8.
8
Implications of reversibility testing on prevalence and risk factors for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: a community study.慢性阻塞性肺疾病可逆性测试对患病率及危险因素的影响:一项社区研究
Thorax. 2005 Oct;60(10):842-7. doi: 10.1136/thx.2005.043943. Epub 2005 Aug 5.
9
Lung hyperinflation and its reversibility in patients with airway obstruction of varying severity.不同严重程度气道阻塞患者的肺过度充气及其可逆性。
COPD. 2010 Dec;7(6):428-37. doi: 10.3109/15412555.2010.528087.
10
Acute bronchodilator responsiveness in subjects with and without airflow obstruction in five Latin American cities: the PLATINO study.在五个拉丁美洲城市中,有和没有气流阻塞的受试者的急性支气管扩张剂反应性:PLATINO 研究。
Pulm Pharmacol Ther. 2010 Feb;23(1):29-35. doi: 10.1016/j.pupt.2009.09.005. Epub 2009 Oct 8.

引用本文的文献

1
Is It Time to Abandon the Postbronchodilator Requirement in Defining Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease?是时候摒弃以支气管扩张剂后情况来定义慢性阻塞性肺疾病的要求了吗?
Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2022 Sep 1;206(5):522-524. doi: 10.1164/rccm.202204-0802ED.
2
The Effectiveness and Harms of Screening for Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease: An Updated Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.慢性阻塞性肺疾病筛查的有效性和危害:一项更新的系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Korean Med Sci. 2022 Apr 11;37(14):e117. doi: 10.3346/jkms.2022.37.e117.
3
Bronchodilator responsiveness or reversibility in asthma and COPD - a need for clarity.
哮喘和慢性阻塞性肺疾病中的支气管扩张剂反应性或可逆性——需要明确界定。
Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis. 2018 Oct 23;13:3511-3513. doi: 10.2147/COPD.S183736. eCollection 2018.
4
Small airway dysfunction and flow and volume bronchodilator responsiveness in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者的小气道功能障碍及气流和容积支气管扩张剂反应性
Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis. 2015 Jun 19;10:1191-7. doi: 10.2147/COPD.S82509. eCollection 2015.
5
Computed tomography structural lung changes in discordant airflow limitation.计算机断层扫描结构肺改变在气流受限不一致。
PLoS One. 2013 Jun 13;8(6):e65177. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0065177. Print 2013.