Suppr超能文献

利用曼彻斯特量表评估拇外翻的有效性。

Validity of self-assessment of hallux valgus using the Manchester scale.

机构信息

Faculty of Health Sciences, La Trobe University, Musculoskeletal Research Centre, Bundoora, Victoria 3086, Australia.

出版信息

BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2010 Sep 20;11:215. doi: 10.1186/1471-2474-11-215.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Hallux valgus (HV) is a common condition involving the progressive subluxation of the first metatarsophalangeal joint due to lateral deviation of the hallux and medial deviation of the first metatarsal. The objective of this study was to evaluate the re-test reliability and validity of self-assessment of HV using a simple clinical screening tool involving four standardised photographs (the Manchester scale), in order to determine whether this tool could be used for postal surveys of the condition.

METHODS

HV was assessed with the Manchester scale in 138 people aged 65 to 93 years of age (102 women and 36 men) as part of a larger randomised controlled trial. At the six month follow-up assessment, HV was reassessed to determine re-test reliability, and participants were asked to self-assess their degree of HV independent of the examiners. Associations between (i) baseline and follow-up assessments of the examiners and (ii) participant and examiner assessments were performed using weighted kappa statistics. Analyses were then repeated after HV was dichotomised as present or absent using unweighted kappa, and sensitivity and specificity of self-assessment of HV was determined.

RESULTS

Re-test reliability of the examiners was substantial to almost perfect (weighted kappa = 0.78 to 0.90), and there was a substantial level of agreement between observations of the participants and the examiners (weighted kappa = 0.71 to 0.80). Overall, there was a slight tendency for participants to rate their HV as less severe than the examiners. When the Manchester scale scores were dichotomised, agreement was substantial to almost perfect for both re-test comparisons (kappa = 0.80 to 0.89) and substantial for comparisons between participants and examiners (kappa = 0.64 to 0.76). The sensitivity and specificity of self-assessment of HV using the dichotomous scale were 85 and 88%, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

The Manchester scale demonstrates high re-test reliability, and self-assessment scores obtained by participants are strongly associated with scores obtained by examiners. These findings indicate that the tool can be used with confidence in postal surveys to document the presence and severity of HV.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ACTRN12608000065392.

摘要

背景

拇外翻(HV)是一种常见病症,主要表现为第一跖趾关节由于拇趾向外偏斜和第一跖骨向内偏斜而逐渐出现半脱位。本研究的目的是评估一种简单的临床筛查工具(即曼彻斯特量表)自我评估 HV 的重测可靠性和有效性,以确定该工具是否可用于 HV 的邮寄调查。

方法

在一项较大的随机对照试验中,我们对 138 名年龄在 65 至 93 岁之间的人(102 名女性和 36 名男性)使用曼彻斯特量表评估 HV。在 6 个月的随访评估中,重新评估 HV 以确定重测可靠性,同时要求参与者独立于检查者评估他们的 HV 程度。使用加权 κ 统计量评估(i)检查者的基线和随访评估之间以及(ii)参与者和检查者评估之间的相关性。然后,使用非加权 κ 分析将 HV 分为存在或不存在后,再次分析,确定 HV 自我评估的敏感性和特异性。

结果

检查者的重测可靠性为中等至极好(加权 κ = 0.78 至 0.90),参与者的观察结果与检查者之间存在相当程度的一致性(加权 κ = 0.71 至 0.80)。总体而言,参与者对 HV 的评估比检查者略轻。当曼彻斯特量表评分分为二分时,两种重测比较的一致性均为中等至极好(κ = 0.80 至 0.89),参与者与检查者之间的一致性也相当高(κ = 0.64 至 0.76)。使用二分量表进行 HV 自我评估的敏感性和特异性分别为 85%和 88%。

结论

曼彻斯特量表显示出很高的重测可靠性,参与者获得的自我评估分数与检查者获得的分数密切相关。这些发现表明,该工具可以在邮寄调查中用于记录 HV 的存在和严重程度。

试验注册

ACTRN12608000065392。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/903d/2954987/8bb78ac779c1/1471-2474-11-215-1.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验