Columbia University Medical Center and the Cardiovascular Research Foundation, New York, New York, USA.
Am J Cardiol. 2010 Oct 1;106(7):941-5. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2010.06.003. Epub 2010 Aug 17.
Clinical outcomes in patients with acute coronary syndromes randomized in the Acute Catheterization and Urgent Intervention Triage Strategy (ACUITY) trial who underwent percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) of saphenous vein grafts (SVGs) were examined. The ACUITY trial assessed the safety and efficacy of bivalirudin alone versus bivalirudin plus a glycoprotein (GP) IIb/IIIa inhibitor versus heparin plus a GP IIb/IIIa inhibitor in 13,819 patients with moderate- and high-risk acute coronary syndromes, 7,789 of whom underwent PCI. A total of 329 patients (4.2%) underwent PCI of SVGs in ACUITY. The primary end points at 30 days were composite ischemia or major adverse cardiac events (death, myocardial infarction, or unplanned target vessel revascularization), major bleeding (unrelated to coronary artery bypass grafting), and net adverse clinical events (composite ischemia or major bleeding). The rates of ischemic, bleeding, and net clinical end points were similar with bivalirudin monotherapy, bivalirudin plus a GP IIb/IIIa inhibitor, and heparin plus a GP IIb/IIIa inhibitor. Net adverse clinical outcome rates at 30 days were 22%, 26%, and 22% (p = 0.67), respectively, for the 3 groups. Major adverse cardiac event rates at 1 year were 37%, 37%, and 43% (p = 0.95), respectively. Minor bleeding unrelated to coronary artery bypass grafting at 30 days was significantly lower with bivalirudin alone compared with heparin plus a GP IIb/IIIa inhibitor (26% vs 38%, p = 0.05). In conclusion, bivalirudin is an effective anticoagulant in PCI of SVGs in acute coronary syndromes, with similar rates of major adverse cardiac events and net adverse cardiac events and lower minor bleeding complications in comparison with heparin plus a GP IIb/IIIa inhibitor or bivalirudin plus a GP IIb/IIIa inhibitor.
对接受经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)的急性冠脉综合征(ACS)患者的临床结果进行了检查,这些患者是在急性导管插入术和紧急介入治疗策略(ACUITY)试验中随机分组的。ACUITY 试验评估了比伐卢定单药治疗、比伐卢定联合糖蛋白(GP)IIb/IIIa 抑制剂与肝素联合 GP IIb/IIIa 抑制剂在 13819 例中危和高危 ACS 患者中的安全性和疗效,其中 7789 例患者接受了 PCI。ACUITY 中共有 329 例患者(4.2%)接受了 SVG 的 PCI。30 天的主要终点是复合缺血或主要不良心脏事件(死亡、心肌梗死或计划外靶血管血运重建)、大出血(与冠状动脉旁路移植术无关)和净不良临床事件(复合缺血或大出血)。与比伐卢定单药治疗、比伐卢定联合 GP IIb/IIIa 抑制剂和肝素联合 GP IIb/IIIa 抑制剂相比,缺血、出血和净临床终点的发生率相似。30 天时的净不良临床结局发生率分别为 22%、26%和 22%(p = 0.67)。1 年时的主要不良心脏事件发生率分别为 37%、37%和 43%(p = 0.95)。30 天时与冠状动脉旁路移植术无关的轻微出血,单用比伐卢定明显低于肝素联合 GP IIb/IIIa 抑制剂(26% vs 38%,p = 0.05)。总之,与肝素联合 GP IIb/IIIa 抑制剂或比伐卢定联合 GP IIb/IIIa 抑制剂相比,比伐卢定在急性冠脉综合征的 SVG-PCI 中是一种有效的抗凝剂,主要不良心脏事件和净不良心脏事件的发生率相似,轻微出血并发症的发生率较低。