Northeast Dairy Foods Research Center, Department of Food Science, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY 14853, USA.
J Dairy Sci. 2010 Oct;93(10):4506-17. doi: 10.3168/jds.2010-3261.
Most current research has focused on using ceramic microfiltration (MF) membranes for micellar casein concentrate production, but little research has focused on the use of polymeric spiral-wound (SW) MF membranes. A method for the production of a serum protein (SP)-reduced micellar casein concentrate using SW MF was compared with a ceramic MF membrane. Pasteurized (79°C, 18s) skim milk (1,100 kg) was microfiltered at 50°C [about 3 × concentration] using a 0.3-μm polyvinylidene fluoride spiral-wound membrane, bleed-and-feed, 3-stage process, using 2 diafiltration stages, where the retentate was diluted 1:2 with reverse osmosis water. Skim milk, permeate, and retentate were analyzed for SP content, and the reduction of SP from skim milk was determined. Theoretically, 68% of the SP content of skim milk can be removed using a single-stage 3× MF. If 2 subsequent water diafiltration stages are used, an additional 22% and 7% of the SP can be removed, respectively, giving a total SP removal of 97%. Removal of SP greater than 95% has been achieved using a 0.1-μm pore size ceramic uniform transmembrane pressure (UTP) MF membrane after a 3-stage MF with diafiltration process. One stage of MF plus 2 stages of diafiltration of 50°C skim milk using a polyvinylidene fluoride polymeric SW 0.3-μm membrane yielded a total SP reduction of only 70.3% (stages 1, 2, and 3: 38.6, 20.8, and 10.9%, respectively). The SP removal rate for the polymeric SW MF membrane was lower in all 3 stages of processing (stages 1, 2, and 3: 0.05, 0.04, and 0.03 kg/m(2) per hour, respectively) than that of the comparable ceramic UTP MF membrane (stages 1, 2, and 3: 0.30, 0.11, and 0.06 kg/m(2) per hour, respectively), indicating that SW MF is less efficient at removing SP from 50°C skim milk than the ceramic UTP system. To estimate the number of steps required for the SW system to reach 95% SP removal, the third-stage SP removal rate (27.4% of the starting material SP content) was used to extrapolate that an additional 5 water diafiltration stages would be necessary, for a total of 8 stages, to remove 95% of the SP from skim milk. The 8-plus stages necessary to remove >95% SP for the SW MF membrane would create more permeate and a lengthier process than required with ceramic membranes.
目前大多数研究都集中在使用陶瓷微滤(MF)膜来生产胶束酪蛋白浓缩物上,但很少有研究集中在使用聚合物螺旋缠绕(SW)MF 膜上。本文比较了使用 SW MF 生产血清蛋白(SP)降低的胶束酪蛋白浓缩物的方法与陶瓷 MF 膜。对巴氏杀菌(79°C,18s)的脱脂乳(1100kg)在 50°C 下进行微过滤[约 3 倍浓缩],使用 0.3-μm 的聚偏二氟乙烯螺旋缠绕膜,采用 3 个阶段的渗滤和进料过程,使用 2 个渗滤阶段,其中截留物用反渗透水稀释 1:2。对脱脂乳、渗透物和截留物进行 SP 含量分析,并确定脱脂乳中 SP 的减少量。理论上,使用单级 3×MF 可以去除 68%的脱脂乳中的 SP。如果使用 2 个后续的水渗滤阶段,分别可以去除另外的 22%和 7%的 SP,总 SP 去除率为 97%。使用 0.1-μm 孔径陶瓷均一跨膜压力(UTP)MF 膜进行 3 级 MF 加渗滤后,可实现 SP 去除率大于 95%。使用聚偏二氟乙烯聚合物 SW 0.3-μm 膜对 50°C 脱脂乳进行 1 级 MF 和 2 级渗滤,仅得到总 SP 减少 70.3%(第 1、2 和 3 阶段分别为 38.6%、20.8%和 10.9%)。在所有 3 个加工阶段(阶段 1、2 和 3:0.05、0.04 和 0.03kg/m2/小时,分别),聚合物 SW MF 膜的 SP 去除率均低于可比的陶瓷 UTP MF 膜(阶段 1、2 和 3:0.30、0.11 和 0.06kg/m2/小时,分别),表明与陶瓷 UTP 系统相比,SW MF 从 50°C 脱脂乳中去除 SP 的效率较低。为了估计 SW 系统达到 95%SP 去除所需的步骤数,使用第 3 阶段的 SP 去除率(起始原料 SP 含量的 27.4%)推断还需要额外的 5 个水渗滤阶段,总共 8 个阶段,才能从脱脂乳中去除 95%的 SP。SW MF 膜去除>95%SP 所需的 8 个以上阶段会产生更多的渗透物和更长的过程,这比使用陶瓷膜所需的时间更长。