Larson A R
Appl Opt. 1993 Oct 20;32(30):5872-84. doi: 10.1364/AO.32.005872.
The design of unstable resonators for large lasers with high Fresnel numbers and circular mirrors requires an ability to calculate their mode structures. Four methods for obtaining mode structure by solving the complex integral equation are analyzed. Included are a numerical method, two hybrid methods, and a virtual-source method. The hybrid methods are basically analytical methods with special numerical integration of analytical solutions (over the feedback mirror) to obtain improved solutions in the output annulus. The hybrid methods are designed for use with high-Fresnel-number resonators. However, their applicability extends into the low-Fresnel-number regime, where a comparison shows one of the hybrid methods agreeing exceptionally well with the numerical method. For analysis at high Fresnel numbers, the hybrid and virtual-source methods are compared with each other. The two hybrid methods are expected to differ from each other in the central core region when the Fresnel number is low, but they are expected to agree with each other when the Fresnel number is high. For the hybrid comparison at a high Fresnel number, the next to lowest loss modes show a similar structure. However, lack of agreement for the lowest loss mode shows that approximations in the development of the second hybrid method cause the selection of the wrong geometrical mode.
对于具有高菲涅耳数和圆形反射镜的大型激光器而言,不稳定谐振腔的设计需要具备计算其模式结构的能力。分析了通过求解复积分方程来获得模式结构的四种方法。其中包括一种数值方法、两种混合方法和一种虚源法。混合方法基本上是解析方法,通过对解析解(在反馈镜上)进行特殊数值积分,以在输出环域中获得改进的解。混合方法专为高菲涅耳数谐振腔设计。然而,它们的适用性可扩展到低菲涅耳数区域,在该区域的比较表明,其中一种混合方法与数值方法的一致性非常好。对于高菲涅耳数下的分析,将混合方法和虚源法相互比较。当菲涅耳数较低时,预计两种混合方法在中心核心区域会有所不同,但当菲涅耳数较高时它们预计会相互一致。对于高菲涅耳数下的混合比较,次低损耗模式显示出相似的结构。然而,最低损耗模式缺乏一致性表明,第二种混合方法在推导过程中的近似导致了错误几何模式的选择。