Department of Medical Oncology, Western Hospital, Footscray; Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, East Melbourne; Royal Melbourne Hospital, Victoria; and Faculty of Medicine, Dentistry and Health Sciences, University of Melbourne, Australia.
J Oncol Pract. 2008 May;4(3):108-13. doi: 10.1200/JOP.0832001.
Determining the optimal starting dose of chemotherapy (CHT) presents a considerable challenge when using body-surface area (BSA)-based dosing, particularly in obese, elderly, or thin patients. We sought to document the range of approaches employed when administering CHT to these patients.
A questionnaire was developed by a panel of oncologists and mailed to all members of the Medical Oncology Group of Australia.
From 315 oncologists, 188 responded (response rate 59.7%). BSA-based dosing is standard practice for 176 (97.2%) of the responding oncologists. In the adjuvant disease setting, 23 (12.7%) use ideal rather than actual body weight (BW) to calculate BSA, or choose whichever is less. When treating obese patients, only 6.1% of respondents routinely use actual BW. Of the remainder, 69.5% either cap the dose at 2 m(2) or use ideal BW. In underweight patients, 95% (n = 171) routinely calculate BSA using actual BW. Forty one respondents (22.7%) routinely reduce dose in the fit elderly.
This analysis of BSA-based CHT dosing methods demonstrates significant variability in practice. Based on evidence from adjuvant studies showing that actual BSA-based dosing is desirable, a substantial number of Australian patients are being underdosed. Further education, together with ongoing research, is required to optimize individualized dosing for efficacy and tolerability.
在使用基于体表面积(BSA)的剂量方案时,确定化疗(CHT)的最佳起始剂量极具挑战性,尤其是在肥胖、老年或瘦弱患者中。我们旨在记录在为这些患者使用 CHT 时所采用的各种方法。
由一组肿瘤学家开发了一份问卷,并邮寄给澳大利亚医学肿瘤学小组的所有成员。
在 315 名肿瘤学家中,有 188 名(回应率为 59.7%)做出了回应。176 名(97.2%)回应的肿瘤学家采用基于 BSA 的剂量方案。在辅助治疗疾病环境中,有 23 名(12.7%)使用理想体重(而不是实际体重)来计算 BSA,或者选择较小的数值。在治疗肥胖患者时,只有 6.1%的受访者常规使用实际体重。对于其余的患者,69.5%的人要么将剂量限制在 2 m 2 ,要么使用理想体重。在体重不足的患者中,95%(n=171)常规使用实际体重计算 BSA。41 名受访者(22.7%)常规为健康的老年患者减少剂量。
对基于 BSA 的 CHT 剂量方案的这种分析表明,实践中存在显著的差异。基于辅助研究的证据表明,理想的实际 BSA 剂量方案是可取的,相当数量的澳大利亚患者的剂量不足。需要进一步的教育和持续的研究,以优化个体化剂量,提高疗效和耐受性。