Department of Preventive Medicine and Biometrics, Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences (USUHS), Bethesda, Maryland, United States of America.
Rev Panam Salud Publica. 2010 Jul;28(1):19-24. doi: 10.1590/s1020-49892010000700003.
To monitor adult mosquito abundance in northern Belize before/after the first tropical storm of the wet season to estimate the time required for development/recovery of potential vector populations; determine which species predominate post-storm; and compare the effectiveness of two types of mosquito traps-octenol-baited Mosquito Magnets® and U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) light traps (with/without octenol).
Field experiments were conducted in Orange Walk Town, Belize, 21 May to 3 June 2008. Incidence rate ratios and exact binomial 95% confidence intervals were reported and trap-nights calculated to compare species abundance pre- and post-storm as well as trap-type effectiveness.
Twice as many species and three times more Anopheles spp. were trapped pre-storm versus post-storm. However, greater numbers of Aedes taeniorhynchus and Culex (Culex) spp. were trapped post-storm. Mosquito Magnets® were consistently more effective than the CDC traps, obtaining twice as many Anopheles spp. and four times as many culicine species as the octenol-baited version (which collected 14 times more mosquitoes overall and 3.5 times more culicine species than the unbaited version). The unbaited CDC trap did not trap any Anopheles spp. during the study period.
Results indicated octenol is an effective attractant for An. crucians in northern Belize; malaria risk in Belize declines immediately post-storm (i.e., mosquito abundance drops); and arboviral risk associated with the rapid increase in culicine mosquitoes post-storm may represent a greater public health threat than malaria (although further research and active disease surveillance is necessary to validate this hypothesis).
在伯利兹北部雨季第一阵热带风暴前后监测成蚊数量,估计潜在病媒蚊种群的发展/恢复所需时间;确定风暴后哪种蚊种占优势;比较两种诱蚊器——八碳醇诱捕的诱蚊器和美国疾病控制与预防中心(CDC)的诱蚊灯(有/无八碳醇)的效果。
2008 年 5 月 21 日至 6 月 3 日在伯利兹奥兰治沃克镇进行现场实验。报告发病率比值和确切二项式 95%置信区间,并计算诱蚊器夜数,以比较风暴前后蚊种丰度以及诱蚊器类型的效果。
风暴前诱捕到的蚊种数量是风暴后的两倍,且诱捕到的按蚊数量是风暴后的三倍。然而,风暴后诱捕到的白纹伊蚊和库蚊(Culex)数量更多。诱蚊器的效果始终优于 CDC 诱蚊器,诱捕到的按蚊数量是八碳醇诱捕版的两倍,库蚊种类是八碳醇诱捕版的四倍(八碳醇诱捕版总共诱捕到的蚊子数量是未诱捕版的 14 倍,诱捕到的库蚊种类数量是未诱捕版的 3.5 倍)。在研究期间,未诱捕的 CDC 诱蚊器没有诱捕到任何按蚊。
结果表明,八碳醇是伯利兹北部三带喙库蚊的有效引诱剂;伯利兹的疟疾风险在风暴后立即下降(即蚊密度降低);与风暴后库蚊数量迅速增加相关的虫媒病毒风险可能比疟疾对公共健康构成更大威胁(尽管需要进一步研究和主动疾病监测来验证这一假设)。