Coleman Shawnta, Peethambaram Prema P, Jatoi Aminah
Department of Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN 55905, USA.
J Cancer Educ. 2011 Sep;26(3):474-7. doi: 10.1007/s13187-010-0166-y.
This study examined how the lay electronic media covers poly-ADP-ribose polymerase, or "PARP," inhibitors, a class of cancer agents currently under clinical investigation. Of 771 internet links, 51 targeted the lay public. Independent review by two investigators yielded the following categorizations: 36 (71%) were "overly positive", 15 (29%) "neutral", and none "overly negative". "Overly positive" articles used: (l) overstated benefit, (2) included quotations from enthusiastic scientists, and (3) discussed single or small patient subsets. They used such phrases as "the holy grail of cancer research", "the most exciting development in cancer research in a decade or more…. it could save thousands of lives", and "we were surprised and delighted…. it's the kind of thing you don't really think will happen". Healthcare providers should be aware of the foregoing when discussing PARP inhibitors-and perhaps other novel therapies-with cancer patients.
本研究调查了大众电子媒体如何报道聚腺苷酸二磷酸核糖聚合酶(PARP)抑制剂,这是一类目前正在进行临床研究的癌症药物。在771个互联网链接中,有51个面向普通大众。由两名研究人员进行的独立审查得出了以下分类:36个(71%)“过于积极”,15个(29%)“中立”,没有“过于消极”的。“过于积极”的文章使用了:(1)夸大益处,(2)引用热情的科学家的话,以及(3)讨论单个或少量患者亚组。它们使用了诸如“癌症研究的圣杯”、“十多年来癌症研究中最激动人心的进展……它可以挽救数千人的生命”以及“我们既惊讶又高兴……这是那种你真的没想到会发生的事情”等表述。医疗保健提供者在与癌症患者讨论PARP抑制剂以及或许其他新型疗法时应知晓上述情况。