Zhang Chuan-yi, Wang Zhang-fu, Hong Zheng-hua, Chen Hai-xiao
Department of Orthopaedics, Taizhou Hospital, Linhai 317000, Zhejiang, China.
Zhongguo Gu Shang. 2010 Aug;23(8):575-7.
To compare the differences between external fixator and volar T-shaped plate in the treatment of complicated fractures of the distal radius and ulna, and evaluate the appropriate operation method for the fractures.
From July 2005 to July 2007, forty-eight cases of complicated fractures of the distal radius and ulna were treated with operation. There were 21 males and 9 females in the internal fixator group, ranged from 22 to 52 years old (with an average of 38.4 +/- 1.5 years). There were 10 mals and 8 femals in the external fixator group,ranged from 25 to 56 years old (with an average of 40.5 +/- 2.3 years). The X-ray films were measured to acquire radial length, palmar tilt and radial inclination after operations. The functional evaluation were scored with a modified Gartland and Werley's (GW) scoring system at 6 and 12 months after operation.
The patients were followed up for 12 to 18 months with an average of 14.2 months. The radial length was (8.82 +/- 0.55) mm, palmar tilt (9.23 +/- 0.86) degrees, radial inclination (19.66 +/- 1.38) degrees in the internal fixator group, while those were (8.25 +/- 0.36) mm, (8.56 +/- 0.72) degrees, (18.82 +/- 1.42) degrees in the external fixator group. The film parameter of internal fixator group was better than the external fixator group, but with no statistical significance (P > 0.05). In the internal fixator group, 16 cases obtained excellent, 7 good, 5 fair, 2 poor, while in the external fixator group, 4 cases obtained excellent, 2 good, 8 fair, 4 poor in 6 months. The GW scores of internal fixator group were lower than that of the external fixator group (P < 0.05). At 12 months after surgery, in the internal fixator group, 17 cases obtained excellent, 7 good, 5 fair, 1 poor; while in the external fixator group, 5 cases obtained excellent, 9 good, 2 fair, 2 poor. The GW score was similar between the two groups (P > 0.05).
The volar T-shaped plate fixation may offer effective stability,the short-term outcome is better than the external fixator group,and there are relatively fewer complications. But the treatment outcome of the two operation methods are similar for the long time follow up.
比较外固定架与掌侧T形钢板治疗桡尺骨远端复杂骨折的差异,评估适合该骨折的手术方法。
2005年7月至2007年7月,对48例桡尺骨远端复杂骨折患者行手术治疗。内固定组男21例,女9例,年龄22~52岁(平均38.4±1.5岁)。外固定架组男10例,女8例,年龄25~56岁(平均40.5±2.3岁)。术后通过X线片测量桡骨长度、掌倾角和桡偏角。术后6个月和12个月采用改良的Gartland和Werley(GW)评分系统进行功能评估。
患者随访12~18个月,平均14.2个月。内固定组桡骨长度为(8.82±0.55)mm,掌倾角(9.23±0.86)°,桡偏角(19.66±1.38)°;外固定架组分别为(8.25±0.36)mm,(8.56±0.72)°,(18.82±1.42)°。内固定组的影像学参数优于外固定架组,但差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。术后6个月,内固定组优16例,良7例,可5例,差2例;外固定架组优4例,良2例,可8例,差4例。内固定组的GW评分低于外固定架组(P<0.05)。术后12个月,内固定组优17例,良7例,可5例,差1例;外固定架组优5例,良9例,可2例,差2例。两组GW评分相近(P>0.05)。
掌侧T形钢板固定可提供有效的稳定性,短期疗效优于外固定架组,并发症相对较少。但两种手术方法的长期随访治疗效果相似。