Müller J, Bruckner G, Kraft E, Hörz W
Department of Prosthodontics, Poliklinik für Prothetik, München, Germany.
Dent Mater. 1990 Jul;6(3):172-7. doi: 10.1016/0109-5641(90)90024-9.
A comparative study was carried out to determine the cytotoxicity of eight different glass-ionomer cements by means of cell culture. Only fibroblast-like cells from the pulp of the same subcultures were used. Factors for the evaluation of the biological tolerance were, first, adhesion of cells to the slides as well as to the material, second, relative growth rates of cultures, and, in addition, cytomorphology. The cultured cells reacted quite differently to the glass-ionomer cements tested. The results imply that cytotoxic substances are eluted from some products even after a hardening period of 48 hours. In contrast, three of the glass-ionomer cements tested had only slight cytotoxic effects on the cultured pulp cells.
通过细胞培养进行了一项比较研究,以确定八种不同玻璃离子水门汀的细胞毒性。仅使用来自同一传代培养牙髓的成纤维细胞样细胞。评估生物耐受性的因素,首先是细胞在玻片以及材料上的黏附情况,其次是培养物的相对生长速率,此外还有细胞形态学。培养的细胞对所测试的玻璃离子水门汀反应差异很大。结果表明,即使在48小时的固化期后,某些产品仍会洗脱细胞毒性物质。相比之下,所测试的三种玻璃离子水门汀对培养的牙髓细胞只有轻微的细胞毒性作用。