West China School of Public Health, Sichuan University, Sichuan 610041, China.
BMC Public Health. 2010 Sep 24;10:573. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-10-573.
The 2008 Wenchuan earthquake resulted in extensive loss of life and physical and psychological injuries for survivors. This research examines the relationship between social support and health-related quality of life for the earthquake survivors.
A multistage cluster sampling strategy was employed to select participants from 11 shelters in nine counties exposed to different degrees of earthquake damage, for a questionnaire survey. The participants were asked to complete the Short Form 36 and the Social Support Rating Scale eight months after the earthquake struck. A total of 1617 participants returned the questionnaires. The quality of life of the survivors (in the four weeks preceding the survey) was compared with that of the general population in the region. Multivariate logistic regression analysis and canonical correlation analysis were performed to determine the association between social support and quality of life.
The earthquake survivors reported poorer quality of life than the general population, with an average of 4.8% to 19.62% reduction in scores of the SF-36 (p < 0.001). The multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that those with stronger social support were more likely to have better quality of life. The canonical correlation analysis found that there was a discrepancy between actual social support received and perceived social support available, and the magnitude of this discrepancy was inversely related to perceived general health (rs = 0.467), and positively related to mental health (rs = 0.395).
Social support is associated with quality of life in the survivors of the earthquake. More attention needs to be paid to increasing social support for those with poorer mental health.
2008 年汶川地震造成了大量生命损失和幸存者的身心伤害。本研究考察了社会支持与地震幸存者健康相关生活质量之间的关系。
采用多阶段聚类抽样策略,从 9 个受灾程度不同的县的 11 个避难所中选择参与者,进行问卷调查。在地震发生 8 个月后,要求参与者完成简明健康状况调查问卷 36 项和社会支持评定量表。共有 1617 名参与者返回了问卷。将幸存者(在调查前四周)的生活质量与该地区一般人群进行了比较。采用多元逻辑回归分析和典型相关分析来确定社会支持与生活质量之间的关系。
地震幸存者报告的生活质量比一般人群差,SF-36 评分平均下降 4.8%至 19.62%(p<0.001)。多元逻辑回归分析表明,社会支持较强的人更有可能生活质量更好。典型相关分析发现,实际获得的社会支持与感知到的可获得的社会支持之间存在差异,这种差异的大小与感知到的一般健康状况呈负相关(rs=0.467),与心理健康呈正相关(rs=0.395)。
社会支持与地震幸存者的生活质量有关。需要更加关注增加那些心理健康状况较差的人的社会支持。