Suppr超能文献

为什么我们在试图记忆时会移动眼睛?非视觉注视模式与记忆的关系。

Why do we move our eyes while trying to remember? The relationship between non-visual gaze patterns and memory.

机构信息

Department of Psychology, Queens College, City University of New York (CUNY), Flushing, NY 11357, USA.

出版信息

Brain Cogn. 2010 Dec;74(3):210-24. doi: 10.1016/j.bandc.2010.07.014. Epub 2010 Sep 22.

Abstract

Non-visual gaze patterns (NVGPs) involve saccades and fixations that spontaneously occur in cognitive activities that are not ostensibly visual. While reasons for their appearance remain obscure, convergent empirical evidence suggests that NVGPs change according to processing requirements of tasks. We examined NVPGs in tasks with long-term memory (LTM) and working memory (WM) requirements. Experiment 1 yielded significantly higher eye movement rate (EMR) in tasks requiring LTM search than in a WM task requiring maintenance of information. Experiment 2 manipulated accessibility of items in study-test episodic tasks using the levels of processing paradigm. EMR was high in episodic recall irrespective of item accessibility. Experiment 3 examined functional significance of saccades in LTM tasks. Voluntary saccadic suppression produced no evidence that saccades contribute to task performance. We discuss the apparent epiphenomenal nature of spontaneous saccades from an evolutionary perspective and outline a neuroanatomical model of the link between the saccadic and memory system.

摘要

非视觉注视模式(NVGPs)涉及到在非明显视觉的认知活动中自发发生的扫视和注视。尽管出现这些模式的原因尚不清楚,但趋同的经验证据表明,NVGPs 根据任务的处理要求而变化。我们在需要长期记忆(LTM)和工作记忆(WM)的任务中检查了 NVPGs。实验 1 表明,在需要 LTM 搜索的任务中,眼动率(EMR)明显高于需要信息维持的 WM 任务。实验 2 使用加工水平范式操纵了学习-测试情节任务中项目的可及性。无论项目的可及性如何,情节回忆中的 EMR 都很高。实验 3 研究了 LTM 任务中扫视的功能意义。自愿抑制扫视并没有表明扫视对任务表现有贡献。我们从进化的角度讨论了自发扫视的明显偶发现象的本质,并概述了扫视和记忆系统之间联系的神经解剖模型。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验