Moser Paul, Wolinsky Toni, Castagné Vincent, Duxon Mark
Porsolt & Partners Pharmacology, 9bis Rue Henri Martin, 92100 Boulogne-Billancourt, France.
J Pharmacol Toxicol Methods. 2011 Mar-Apr;63(2):160-7. doi: 10.1016/j.vascn.2010.09.004. Epub 2010 Sep 22.
Preclinical assessment of drug abuse and dependence has been the subject of several recent regulatory guidelines. Both the European and US authorities recommend a tiered approach and are generally aligned on the methods which should be used. The first tier simply compares the pharmacology of the novel substance to known drugs of abuse. The second tier aims to identify abuse and dependence liability more directly. The most direct approach to assessing reinforcing properties is the i.v. self-administration procedure. Unfortunately there is no standardized procedure for evaluating substances with differing potencies, reinforcement properties or pharmacokinetics (PK). Indeed, the choice of training substance, species and procedural parameters can radically affect the outcome. Apart from the lower cost of the rat, the primate presents several advantages for self-administration studies (potentially greater similarity to humans in behavioral effects, active doses and PK). Although it does not measure abuse liability directly, drug discrimination is a powerful method for assessing the similarity of a test substance to a known drug of abuse. In this procedure an animal uses the interoceptive effects of the substance as the discriminative stimulus to determine which of two responses to make. For certain classes of substance, such as hallucinogens acting via the 5-HT(2A) receptor, discrimination is the only procedure currently able to identify them. Drug dependence is assessed by the occurrence of withdrawal effects on drug discontinuation. Although conceptually simple, many factors (duration and frequency of drug treatment, dose/exposure levels, duration of observation after discontinuation) can complicate interpretation. Telemetry may represent a novel approach which allows continuous observation of somatic and behavioral parameters during drug withdrawal thereby increasing sensitivity. Presently available tools can identify essentially all substances known to cause abuse or dependence with little risk of false positives. It remains unclear how effective these models will be with entirely novel substances. Nonetheless, drug abuse/dependence is an area of safety pharmacology where the predictive value of animal models remains very high.
药物滥用和成瘾的临床前评估一直是近期多项监管指南的主题。欧洲和美国当局均推荐采用分层方法,且在应使用的方法上总体保持一致。第一层只是将新物质的药理学特性与已知的滥用药物进行比较。第二层旨在更直接地确定滥用和成瘾的可能性。评估强化特性最直接的方法是静脉内自我给药程序。不幸的是,对于评估具有不同效力、强化特性或药代动力学(PK)的物质,尚无标准化程序。实际上,训练物质、物种和程序参数的选择会从根本上影响结果。除了大鼠成本较低外,灵长类动物在自我给药研究中具有几个优势(在行为效应、有效剂量和药代动力学方面可能与人类有更大的相似性)。虽然药物辨别不能直接测量滥用可能性,但它是评估受试物质与已知滥用药物相似性的有力方法。在这个程序中,动物利用物质的内感受效应作为辨别刺激来确定做出两种反应中的哪一种。对于某些类别的物质,如通过5-HT(2A)受体起作用的致幻剂,辨别是目前唯一能够识别它们的程序。药物成瘾通过停药后戒断效应的出现来评估。虽然从概念上讲很简单,但许多因素(药物治疗的持续时间和频率、剂量/暴露水平、停药后的观察持续时间)会使解释变得复杂。遥测技术可能是一种新方法,它允许在药物戒断期间持续观察躯体和行为参数,从而提高敏感性。目前可用的工具基本上可以识别所有已知会导致滥用或成瘾的物质,假阳性风险很小。目前尚不清楚这些模型对全新物质的效果如何。尽管如此,药物滥用/成瘾是安全药理学的一个领域,动物模型的预测价值仍然非常高。