Department of Rehabilitation Psychology, Daegu University, Gyeongsan, South Korea.
Neuroimage. 2011 Feb 1;54(3):2446-61. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2010.09.045. Epub 2010 Sep 30.
The present study performed a quantitative meta-analysis of functional MRI studies that used a subsequent memory approach. The meta-analysis considered both subsequent memory (SM; remembered>forgotten) and subsequent forgetting (SF; forgotten>remembered) effects, restricting the data used to that concerning visual information encoding in healthy young adults. The meta-analysis of SM effects indicated that they most consistently associated with five neural regions: left inferior frontal cortex (IFC), bilateral fusiform cortex, bilateral hippocampal formation, bilateral premotor cortex (PMC), and bilateral posterior parietal cortex (PPC). Direct comparisons of the SM effects between the studies using verbal versus pictorial material and item-memory versus associative-memory tasks yielded three main sets of findings. First, the left IFC exhibited greater SM effects during verbal material than pictorial material encoding, whereas the fusiform cortex exhibited greater SM effects during pictorial material rather than verbal material encoding. Second, bilateral hippocampal regions showed greater SM effects during pictorial material encoding compared to verbal material encoding. Furthermore, the left hippocampal region showed greater SM effects during pictorial-associative versus pictorial-item encoding. Third, bilateral PMC and PPC regions, which may support attention during encoding, exhibited greater SM effects during item encoding than during associative encoding. The meta-analysis of SF effects indicated they associated mostly with default-mode network regions, including the anterior and posterior midline cortex, the bilateral temporoparietal junction, and the bilateral superior frontal cortex. Recurrent activity oscillations between the task-positive and task-negative/default-mode networks may account for trial-to-trial variability in participants' encoding performances, which is a fundamental source of both SM and SF effects. Taken together, these findings clarify the neural activity that supports successful encoding, as well as the neural activity that leads to encoding failure.
本研究对使用后续记忆法的功能磁共振成像研究进行了定量荟萃分析。荟萃分析考虑了后续记忆(SM;记住>遗忘)和后续遗忘(SF;遗忘>记住)效应,将数据限制在健康年轻成年人的视觉信息编码上。SM 效应的荟萃分析表明,它们最一致地与五个神经区域相关:左侧额下回(IFC)、双侧梭状回、双侧海马体、双侧前运动皮层(PMC)和双侧顶后皮质(PPC)。对使用言语材料与图像材料以及项目记忆与联想记忆任务的研究中的 SM 效应进行直接比较,得出了三组主要发现。首先,在言语材料编码期间,左 IFC 表现出比图像材料更强的 SM 效应,而在图像材料编码期间,梭状回表现出比言语材料更强的 SM 效应。其次,双侧海马体区域在图像材料编码期间比言语材料编码时表现出更强的 SM 效应。此外,左海马体在图像联想编码时比图像项目编码时表现出更强的 SM 效应。第三,双侧 PMC 和 PPC 区域,可能在编码期间支持注意力,在项目编码时比在联想编码时表现出更强的 SM 效应。SF 效应的荟萃分析表明,它们主要与默认模式网络区域相关,包括前中线和后中线皮质、双侧颞顶联合区和双侧额上回。任务正性和任务负性/默认模式网络之间的反复活动振荡可能解释了参与者编码表现的试验间变异性,这是 SM 和 SF 效应的基本来源。综上所述,这些发现阐明了支持成功编码的神经活动,以及导致编码失败的神经活动。